- This topic has 3 replies, 2 voices, and was last updated 1 year ago by .
Viewing 4 posts - 1 through 4 (of 4 total)
Viewing 4 posts - 1 through 4 (of 4 total)
- The topic ‘WACC – Coeden Co vs Tisa Co’ is closed to new replies.
OpenTuition recommends the new interactive BPP books for March 2025 exams.
Get your discount code >>
Forums › Ask ACCA Tutor Forums › Ask the Tutor ACCA AFM Exams › WACC – Coeden Co vs Tisa Co
Hi There,
I’ve noticed that in these two questions the WACC calculation is different.
In Coeden, the debt portion of the WACC is multiplied by (1-t)
but in Tisa, its not.
Please could you advise?
Best,
B
Multiplying by 1-t is accounting for the tax saving on debt in order to calculate the cost of debt to the company i.e. the after tax cost of debt. (We only multiply by 1-t when it is irredeemable debt. If redeemable debt we should calculate the IRR of the after-tax flows instead, as I explain in my free lectures).
However in Tisa the question specifically says that the 4.5% is already the after tax cost of debt.
Many thanks!
You are welcome 🙂