- This topic has 3 replies, 2 voices, and was last updated 1 year ago by .
Viewing 4 posts - 1 through 4 (of 4 total)
Viewing 4 posts - 1 through 4 (of 4 total)
- The topic ‘Viola Co – Study Hub practice question’ is closed to new replies.
Interactive BPP books for September 2026 exams, recommended by OpenTuition.
Get discount code >>
Forums › Ask ACCA Tutor Forums › Ask the Tutor ACCA AA Exams › Viola Co – Study Hub practice question
As part of your overall review, you have performed analytical procedures over the draft financial statements and have noted that the trade receivables collection period is lower than it was during the interim audit performed in October 20X4. You are aware that the credit controller of Viola Co left the company in November 20X4 and that the directors have said that, as a result, the company is experiencing difficulties in debt collection.
Which of the following is a valid explanation for the INCONSISTENCY between the results of the analytical procedures on trade receivables and the directors’ statement regarding debt collection problems?
A.A change in sales mix towards high value products
B.An increase in the proportion of cash sales since November 20X4
C.An increase in the rate of sales tax in December 20X4
D.Sales growth of 1% per month over the year
The correct answer is B, however, I thought revenue figure used in calculating receivables days include credit sales only and not cash sales and so, the increase in cash sales should not affect the calculation.
Could you please clarify this?
Thank you in advance,
Iniss.
If the proportion of cash increases, the credit portion is decreasing, decreasing the $ amount of credit sales and receivables. The effect on receivables is proportionally greater than on credit sales, so the collection days will be lower compared to the PY.
I get it now.
Thank you for your explanation.
You’re very welcome!
