• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free Notes, Lectures, Tests and Forums for ACCA and CIMA exams

  • ACCA
  • CIMA
  • FIA
  • OBU
  • Books
  • Forums
  • Ask AI
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login
  • ACCA Forums
  • Ask ACCA Tutor
  • CIMA Forums
  • Ask CIMA Tutor
  • FIA
  • OBU
  • Buy/Sell Books
  • All Forums
  • Latest Topics

20% off ACCA & CIMA Books

OpenTuition recommends the new interactive BPP books for March and June 2025 exams.
Get your discount code >>

Venue dec 2011

Forums › Ask ACCA Tutor Forums › Ask the Tutor ACCA SBR Exams › Venue dec 2011

  • This topic has 3 replies, 2 voices, and was last updated 12 years ago by acca13.
Viewing 4 posts - 1 through 4 (of 4 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • April 28, 2013 at 6:55 am #123698
    acca13
    Member
    • Topics: 57
    • Replies: 175
    • ☆☆☆

    Q4:
    Venue enters into a contract with a customer to provide computers at a value of $1 million. The terms are
    that payment is due one month after the sale of the goods. On the basis of experience with other contractors
    with similar characteristics, Venue considers that there is a 5% risk that the customer will not pay the
    amount due after the goods have been delivered and the property transferred. Venue subsequently felt that
    the financial condition of the customer has deteriorated and that the trade receivable is further impaired by
    $100,000.

    Solution:
    Under IAS 18, revenue would be recognised of $1 million and a trade receivable of the same amount set up. The debt
    would be assessed periodically for impairment and, in this case, it would be deemed to be impaired by $100,000. The
    5% risk of not paying does not create a receivables expense as it is the risk of not paying the entire balance and hence
    is insignificant. If the scenario had been that 5% of the revenue was uncollectable in this instance a receivables expense
    of $50,000 would be required. This impairment would be recognised as an expense rather than a reduction in revenue.
    However, if credit risk were taken into account in assessing revenue to be recognised, the transaction price would be
    reduced to $950,000. Revenue and a receivable would be recognised of this amount. The impairment of $100,000
    would be recognised as an expense and not as a reduction in revenue.

    April 28, 2013 at 7:00 am #123699
    acca13
    Member
    • Topics: 57
    • Replies: 175
    • ☆☆☆

    Hi there,

    could you please explain it to me why $100000 would not be taken as a reduction in revenue?

    April 28, 2013 at 10:10 am #123764
    MikeLittle
    Keymaster
    • Topics: 27
    • Replies: 23300
    • ☆☆☆☆☆

    Because, at the date of sale, the revenue earned was $1 million. Subsequently realisability has been reassessed as only $900,000. When ( in your F3 days ) a debt was considered to be doubtful, the impairment was expensed – it was never deducted from revenue.

    Does that answer it?

    April 28, 2013 at 8:25 pm #123804
    acca13
    Member
    • Topics: 57
    • Replies: 175
    • ☆☆☆

    Yes, thank you very much.

  • Author
    Posts
Viewing 4 posts - 1 through 4 (of 4 total)
  • The topic ‘Venue dec 2011’ is closed to new replies.

Primary Sidebar

Donate
If you have benefited from our materials, please donate

ACCA News:

ACCA My Exam Performance for non-variant

Applied Skills exams is available NOW

ACCA Options:  “Read the Mind of the Marker” articles

Subscribe to ACCA’s Student Accountant Direct

ACCA CBE 2025 Exams

How was your exam, and what was the exam result?

BT CBE exam was.. | MA CBE exam was..
FA CBE exam was.. | LW CBE exam was..

Donate

If you have benefited from OpenTuition please donate.

PQ Magazine

Latest Comments

  • Gowri7 on Relevant cash flows for DCF Working capital (examples 2 and 3) – ACCA Financial Management (FM)
  • Govere on The use of ratios and comparisons in auditing
  • John Moffat on Relevant cash flows for DCF Working capital (examples 2 and 3) – ACCA Financial Management (FM)
  • Gowri7 on Relevant cash flows for DCF Working capital (examples 2 and 3) – ACCA Financial Management (FM)
  • Ken Garrett on The nature and structure of organisations – ACCA Paper BT

Copyright © 2025 · Support · Contact · Advertising · OpenLicense · About · Sitemap · Comments · Log in