• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free Notes, Lectures, Tests and Forums for ACCA and CIMA exams

  • ACCA
  • CIMA
  • FIA
  • OBU
  • Books
  • Forums
  • Ask AI
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login
  • ACCA Forums
  • Ask ACCA Tutor
  • CIMA Forums
  • Ask CIMA Tutor
  • FIA
  • OBU
  • Buy/Sell Books
  • All Forums
  • Latest Topics

20% off ACCA & CIMA Books

OpenTuition recommends the new interactive BPP books for March and June 2025 exams.
Get your discount code >>

variance

Forums › Ask ACCA Tutor Forums › Ask the Tutor ACCA PM Exams › variance

  • This topic has 3 replies, 2 voices, and was last updated 2 years ago by John Moffat.
Viewing 4 posts - 1 through 4 (of 4 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • November 20, 2022 at 6:53 pm #671947
    afrazali10
    Participant
    • Topics: 18
    • Replies: 17
    • ☆

    To produce 19 litres of product X, a standard input mix of 8 litres of chemical A and 12 litres of chemical B is required.

     

    Chemical A has a standard cost of $20 per litre and chemical B has a standard cost of $25 per litre.

     

    During September, the actual results showed that 1,850 litres of product X were produced, using a total input of 900 litres of chemical A and 1,100 litres of chemical B.

     

    The actual costs of chemicals A and B were at the standard cost of $20 and $25 per litre respectively.

    Answers
    both favouable
    both adverse
    mix favourable yield adverse
    yield fovurable mix adverse

    sir i got actual total yield to be 1850X how come it is 2000 when its given in the question 1850 of X while calculating mix variance ? and in yield variance actual output is 1850 and we should get yield of 1900 ((2000*19)\20) so its yield adverse why is it the other way round in marking scheme . also its odd when 20 input produces 19 output how come ? in your lecture it was nothing like above all input added up to an output (like A1 + B2 = 3X) unlike the above question can you explain why ?
    thankyou
     

    November 21, 2022 at 9:19 am #671976
    John Moffat
    Keymaster
    • Topics: 57
    • Replies: 54655
    • ☆☆☆☆☆

    The actual yield is not 2,000 – it is 1,850.

    For the mix variance we take the actual total input which is 900 + 1,100 = 2,000, and compare the actual mix (900 and 1,100) with the standard mix (which should be 8 and 12 for every 20 litres input). For the mix variance we are not interested in whether or not the yield was as it should be (that is looked at in the yield variance). We are only looking at how the input was mixed between the two materials.

    November 21, 2022 at 12:02 pm #671982
    afrazali10
    Participant
    • Topics: 18
    • Replies: 17
    • ☆

    in marking scheme for yield it is AQSM = 2000 and SQSM = 1947 ?? this question is bpp page 326 question 5 . also how is he calculating 1947 for standard quatity at standard mix ?

    November 21, 2022 at 2:52 pm #671989
    John Moffat
    Keymaster
    • Topics: 57
    • Replies: 54655
    • ☆☆☆☆☆

    From the standard cost card, for every 19 litres produced they should be inputting 8 + 12 = 20 litres.

    Therefore for actual production of 1,850 litres they should have been inputting 20/19 x 1,850 = 1,947 litres.

    Have you watched my free lectures on mix and yield variances?

  • Author
    Posts
Viewing 4 posts - 1 through 4 (of 4 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
Log In

Primary Sidebar

Donate
If you have benefited from our materials, please donate

ACCA News:

ACCA My Exam Performance for non-variant

Applied Skills exams is available NOW

ACCA Options:  “Read the Mind of the Marker” articles

Subscribe to ACCA’s Student Accountant Direct

ACCA CBE 2025 Exams

How was your exam, and what was the exam result?

BT CBE exam was.. | MA CBE exam was..
FA CBE exam was.. | LW CBE exam was..

Donate

If you have benefited from OpenTuition please donate.

PQ Magazine

Latest Comments

  • Gowri7 on Relevant cash flows for DCF Working capital (examples 2 and 3) – ACCA Financial Management (FM)
  • Govere on The use of ratios and comparisons in auditing
  • John Moffat on Relevant cash flows for DCF Working capital (examples 2 and 3) – ACCA Financial Management (FM)
  • Gowri7 on Relevant cash flows for DCF Working capital (examples 2 and 3) – ACCA Financial Management (FM)
  • Ken Garrett on The nature and structure of organisations – ACCA Paper BT

Copyright © 2025 · Support · Contact · Advertising · OpenLicense · About · Sitemap · Comments · Log in