Skip to content

Ask the Tutor ACCA PM

VARIANCE

Sstudent3y ago
Fort Co produces and sells three models of family car: a basic model (the Drastic), an upgraded model (the Bomber) and a deluxe model (the Cracker). All of the cars are priced to achieve a 6% mark up on standard cost. For the month of June, Fort Co budgeted to sell 30,000 units of the Drastic and so have 10% market share of the budgeted sales at a price of $10,600 each. Fort Co. actually achieved a 15% share of the market, though the market had actually contracted by 5%. The following information is available for July. Drastic Bomber Cracker Sales units: – Budgeted 27,000 15,000 18,000 – Actual 26,000 16,000 14,000 Budgeted sales price $10,600 $13,250 $16,960 Which TWO of the following statements are true? (1) The sales mix variance would not give useful information to the management of Fort Co if the Cracker was a van. (2) The sales mix variance will not be affected if the labour efficiency on the Drastic production line increases, all other factors remaining the same. (3) The market share variance is a planning variance, not an operational variance. (4) If the mix variance was calculated as a physical quantity, the answer would always be zero. A (1) and (2) B (2) and (3) C (3) and (4) D (1) and (4)
Sstudent3y ago#1
can you explain why 1 and 4 is correct. also how is 2 false?
John MoffatJohn MoffatTutor3y ago#2
1. Mix variances are relevant when customers buy one car instead of another car - i.e. the products are substitutable. People are less likely to by a van instead of a car. 4. I specifically mention this in my lectures and I do suggest that you watch them. Buying more units of one car automatically means buying fewer of another. 2. If they are more efficient they will produce more, and bigger volumes result in bigger revenues and profits.
Sstudent3y ago#3
understood, thankyou
John MoffatJohn MoffatTutor3y ago#4
You are welcome :-)
This topic is locked — no new replies.