- This topic has 1 reply, 2 voices, and was last updated 1 year ago by
.
-
Posts
-
Hi Tutor, I have a question regarding the concept of confidence levels. From my understanding, when we say the confidence level is 95%, it means there is a 2.5% chance that the value might fall below the lower tail, and a 2.5% chance that it might exceed the upper tail, assuming a standard normal distribution.
However, during the lecture, we considered only the lower tail, where the probability of the value falling below this threshold is 5%. This seems different from what I expected, as I thought it should only be 2.5% for the lower tail, with the remaining 2.5% corresponding to the upper tail. I understand that we are measuring the value at risk, but I’m curious as to why the lower tail is assigned a 5% probability in this context.
Could you please clarify this? Thank you so much for your help in advance!
If you want to askthe tutor something directly, please use the ask the tutor forum-
My own opinion on your question is that you are right about standard normal distributions but with value at risk the concentration is on adverse outcomes.
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.