• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free Notes, Lectures, Tests and Forums for ACCA and CIMA exams

  • ACCA
  • CIMA
  • FIA
  • OBU
  • Books
  • Forums
  • Ask AI
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login
  • ACCA Forums
  • Ask ACCA Tutor
  • CIMA Forums
  • Ask CIMA Tutor
  • FIA
  • OBU
  • Buy/Sell Books
  • All Forums
  • Latest Topics

20% off ACCA & CIMA Books

OpenTuition recommends the new interactive BPP books for September 2025 exams.
Get your discount code >>

VAR

Forums › Ask ACCA Tutor Forums › Ask the Tutor ACCA AFM Exams › VAR

  • This topic has 5 replies, 2 voices, and was last updated 4 years ago by John Moffat.
Viewing 6 posts - 1 through 6 (of 6 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • June 16, 2021 at 11:35 am #625433
    joynow
    Member
    • Topics: 42
    • Replies: 38
    • ☆☆

    Hi Sir. Past year from Dec 2014 Q3

    How to calculate Value at risk (VAR) for

    i) 1.645 standard deviation from the mean, if only has 95% confidence level ?

    ii) 1.282 standard deviation from the mean, if only has 90% confidence level ?

    June 16, 2021 at 4:15 pm #625466
    John Moffat
    Keymaster
    • Topics: 57
    • Replies: 54696
    • ☆☆☆☆☆

    I am not quite sure what you are asking.

    We multiply the z value from the tables by the std dev’n x the square root of 5 (because it is over 5 years).

    Have you not watched my free lectures on VaR?

    June 17, 2021 at 5:51 am #625500
    joynow
    Member
    • Topics: 42
    • Replies: 38
    • ☆☆

    Thank you, Sir.

    I wonder how they calculate the 1.645 and 1.282 from?

    June 17, 2021 at 8:51 am #625529
    John Moffat
    Keymaster
    • Topics: 57
    • Replies: 54696
    • ☆☆☆☆☆

    But I explain this in my free lectures – again, have you watched them?
    (You cannot expect me to type out all my lectures here).

    They are found by working backwards using the normal distribution tables provided. There is no need to do it to three decimal places – just using the nearest to 2 decimal places in the tables is sufficient rather than apportioning between two values.

    June 18, 2021 at 9:55 am #625649
    joynow
    Member
    • Topics: 42
    • Replies: 38
    • ☆☆

    Thank you, Sir, I know how to find it.
    By using 0.5 – 0.1 (90%)= 0.4, then directly find figures in the table, which gives 1.28.

    June 18, 2021 at 3:11 pm #625702
    John Moffat
    Keymaster
    • Topics: 57
    • Replies: 54696
    • ☆☆☆☆☆

    That is correct 🙂

  • Author
    Posts
Viewing 6 posts - 1 through 6 (of 6 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
Log In

Primary Sidebar

Donate
If you have benefited from our materials, please donate

ACCA News:

ACCA My Exam Performance for non-variant

Applied Skills exams is available NOW

ACCA Options:  “Read the Mind of the Marker” articles

Subscribe to ACCA’s Student Accountant Direct

ACCA CBE 2025 Exams

How was your exam, and what was the exam result?

BT CBE exam was.. | MA CBE exam was..
FA CBE exam was.. | LW CBE exam was..

Donate

If you have benefited from OpenTuition please donate.

PQ Magazine

Latest Comments

  • Bimasha@123 on Discounted Cash Flow Techniques – ACCA Advanced Performance Management (APM)
  • Ken Garrett on Discounted Cash Flow Techniques – ACCA Advanced Performance Management (APM)
  • Bimasha@123 on Discounted Cash Flow Techniques – ACCA Advanced Performance Management (APM)
  • John Moffat on AA Chapter 7 Questions
  • John Moffat on FA Chapter 12 Questions Sales Tax

Copyright © 2025 · Support · Contact · Advertising · OpenLicense · About · Sitemap · Comments · Log in