• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free Notes, Lectures, Tests and Forums for ACCA and CIMA exams

  • ACCA
  • CIMA
  • FIA
  • OBU
  • Books
  • Forums
  • Ask AI
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login
  • ACCA Forums
  • Ask ACCA Tutor
  • FIA Forums
  • CIMA Forums
  • OBU Forums
  • Qualified Members forum
  • Buy/Sell Books
  • All Forums
  • Latest Topics

Save 20% on ACCA & CIMA Books

Interactive BPP books for June 2026 exams, recommended by OpenTuition.
Get discount code >>

Valuation of Merges and Acquisitions

Forums › Ask ACCA Tutor Forums › Ask the Tutor ACCA AFM Exams › Valuation of Merges and Acquisitions

  • This topic has 3 replies, 2 voices, and was last updated 11 years ago by AvatarJohn Moffat.
Viewing 4 posts - 1 through 4 (of 4 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • March 7, 2015 at 5:15 pm #231631
    AvatarDorota
    Member
    • Topics: 4
    • Replies: 2
    • ☆

    I am currently going through the Example 2 of the above chapter.
    I have a question regarding the answer. As said in the notes to arrive at cash flows, we need to add the cash flows of separate companies plus any synergies expected. For example, in the year 1 the projected cash flows of Nairobi is 20, of Delhi is 8 and the synergy is 10, The total is 20+8+10 = 38. In your answer is 35. Similar differences are in year 2 to 5 as well. I do not know where the differences are coming from.
    Second question, in your answer you wrote that shareholders of Nairobi will gain 4 if the acquisition goes ahead. I am not sure where this 4 is coming from.
    Could you please explain?

    March 8, 2015 at 9:12 am #231667
    AvatarJohn Moffat
    Keymaster
    • Topics: 57
    • Replies: 54845
    • ☆☆☆☆☆

    The synergistic amount of 10 is assumed to be before tax – there is tax of 30% and so it is 7 after tax.

    With regard to your second question, it is a typing error which I will have corrected. The gain is 7 ( 177 – 170)

    March 9, 2015 at 2:37 pm #231788
    AvatarDorota
    Member
    • Topics: 4
    • Replies: 2
    • ☆

    Thank you very much!
    So should we always assumed that this sinergetic amount will be given pre tax if no specific information be given?

    March 9, 2015 at 6:45 pm #231809
    AvatarJohn Moffat
    Keymaster
    • Topics: 57
    • Replies: 54845
    • ☆☆☆☆☆

    Yes – that is most likely the case in practice. (Although in the exam it will probably be made clear anyway).

    Also, in the exam, always state your assumptions – provided your assumptions are sensible you will still get the marks even if your solution is different from that of the examiners.

  • Author
    Posts
Viewing 4 posts - 1 through 4 (of 4 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
Log In

Primary Sidebar

ACCA News:

ACCA My Exam Performance for non-variant

Applied Skills exams is available NOW

ACCA Options:  “Read the Mind of the Marker” articles

Subscribe to ACCA’s Student Accountant Direct

ACCA CBE Exams – Instant Poll

How was your exam, and what was the exam result?

BT CBE exam was.. | MA CBE exam was..
FA CBE exam was.. | LW CBE exam was..

Donate

If you have benefited from OpenTuition please donate.

PQ Magazine

Latest Comments

  • TEDI on IAS 16 Property, plant and equipment – Initial Recognition – CIMA F1 Financial Reporting
  • ChanNV on Framework – measurement – ACCA Financial Reporting (FR)
  • ChanNV on IASB Conceptual Framework – Introduction – ACCA Financial Reporting (FR)
  • Konstantinos43 on Financial Performance Measurement – Liquidity Measures – ACCA Management Accounting (MA)
  • Hirak.5 on ACCA TX-UK FA2025 Chapter 3 Property Income and Investments – Individuals

Copyright © 2026 · Contact · Advertising · OpenLicense · About · Sitemap · Privacy Policy · Cookie settings · Comments · Log in