• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free Notes, Lectures, Tests and Forums for ACCA and CIMA exams

  • ACCA
  • CIMA
  • FIA
  • OBU
  • Books
  • Forums
  • Ask AI
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login
  • ACCA Forums
  • Ask ACCA Tutor
  • CIMA Forums
  • Ask CIMA Tutor
  • FIA
  • OBU
  • Buy/Sell Books
  • All Forums
  • Latest Topics

20% off ACCA & CIMA Books

OpenTuition recommends the new interactive BPP books for March and June 2025 exams.
Get your discount code >>

using high-low method in question 1 of chapter 4 in F2 note

Forums › ACCA Forums › ACCA MA Management Accounting Forums › using high-low method in question 1 of chapter 4 in F2 note

  • This topic has 6 replies, 3 voices, and was last updated 9 years ago by John Moffat.
Viewing 7 posts - 1 through 7 (of 7 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • August 31, 2015 at 4:30 am #269207
    khanhhoangvu
    Participant
    • Topics: 4
    • Replies: 1
    • ☆

    levels of activity (units) Total Cost ( $)
    16.000 135.000
    22.000 170.000

    Variable cost per unit remain constant within the range of activity levels, but there is a step up of 5.000$ in the total fixed cost when the activity level exceeds of 17.500 units.

    what is the total cost at activity of 20.000 unit by using high – loe method.

    1. in my point:

    variable cost per unit = ($170.000 – $135.000) / (22.000 – 16.000) = 5.8 $
    the total cost at high levels was: 170.000 $
    the total variable cost was : 5.8$ * 22.000 = 127.600$
    the total fixed cost was: $170.000 – $ 127.600 = $ 42.400

    At output of 20.000:
    Due to variable cost per unit was unchanged and the total fixed cost also was unchanged
    so:

    the total variable cost = 5.8$ * 20.000 = $ 116.000
    the total stepped fixed cost = $ 42.400 + $ 5.000 = $ 47.400
    ==> the total cost must was : $116.000 + $47.400 = $ 163.400

    However, the correct answer in F2 notes was $163.000. I saw the solution in note but still did’t get why the minus $5.000 in total cost when determine variable cost per unit, not plus $ 5.000 into fixed cost at output 20.000.

    please explain my confused with many thanks

    August 31, 2015 at 7:27 am #269221
    John Moffat
    Keymaster
    • Topics: 57
    • Replies: 54659
    • ☆☆☆☆☆

    The first line of your workings is wrong.
    The difference between 170,000 and 135,000 is not due simply to the extra variable cost (which is what your workings assume). 5,000 of it is the increase in the fixed cost and therefore only the remaining 30,000 is due to the extra variable cost.

    September 1, 2015 at 5:11 pm #269454
    xross
    Member
    • Topics: 0
    • Replies: 4
    • ☆

    hallo, Mr john Moffat
    -the question is saying, there is a step up of $5.000 in the fixed cost when the activity levels exceeds 17.500 units. why then are we subtracting this step up from 135000 which has the quatity which has not exceeded 17.500 unit. instead of subtracting it from 170.000 which has quantity of more than 17.500. help me to understand sir. thanx

    September 1, 2015 at 5:35 pm #269456
    xross
    Member
    • Topics: 0
    • Replies: 4
    • ☆

    hi khan!

    in my view,

    variable cost = [(170000 – 5000) – 135000] / (22000 – 16000)
    =30000 / 6000 = 5 per unit
    fixed cost = (170000 – 5000) – (22000 * 5) = 55000 as the fixed cost.

    TC = FC + VC = 55000 + 5(20000) = 155000
    adding $5000 to the total cost we have $160000 as our total cost

    September 1, 2015 at 10:39 pm #269497
    John Moffat
    Keymaster
    • Topics: 57
    • Replies: 54659
    • ☆☆☆☆☆

    Good heavens – what you have written is exactly the same as what I wrote!!

    I did not say to subtract the 5000 from 135000 at all.

    I said to subtract it from the difference of 35000, which is exactly what you have done!!!!

    September 3, 2015 at 7:50 pm #269734
    xross
    Member
    • Topics: 0
    • Replies: 4
    • ☆

    Thanks a lot sir. I think I must have mis interpreted what you wrote. My bad.

    September 4, 2015 at 8:06 am #269781
    John Moffat
    Keymaster
    • Topics: 57
    • Replies: 54659
    • ☆☆☆☆☆

    No problem 🙂

  • Author
    Posts
Viewing 7 posts - 1 through 7 (of 7 total)
  • The topic ‘using high-low method in question 1 of chapter 4 in F2 note’ is closed to new replies.

Primary Sidebar

Donate
If you have benefited from our materials, please donate

ACCA News:

ACCA My Exam Performance for non-variant

Applied Skills exams is available NOW

ACCA Options:  “Read the Mind of the Marker” articles

Subscribe to ACCA’s Student Accountant Direct

ACCA CBE 2025 Exams

How was your exam, and what was the exam result?

BT CBE exam was.. | MA CBE exam was..
FA CBE exam was.. | LW CBE exam was..

Donate

If you have benefited from OpenTuition please donate.

PQ Magazine

Latest Comments

  • thienan0110 on Interest rate risk management (1) Part 5 – ACCA (AFM) lectures
  • Venoth on Time Series Analysis – ACCA Management Accounting (MA)
  • mrjonbain on Professionalism, ethical codes and the public interest – ACCA Strategic Business Leader (SBL)
  • mrjonbain on Professionalism, ethical codes and the public interest – ACCA Strategic Business Leader (SBL)
  • kemo1000 on Financial instruments – convertible debentures – ACCA Financial Reporting (FR)

Copyright © 2025 · Support · Contact · Advertising · OpenLicense · About · Sitemap · Comments · Log in