Forums › OBU Forums › Using an AIRLINE for T8
- This topic has 420 replies, 63 voices, and was last updated 2 years ago by trephena.
- AuthorPosts
- March 28, 2017 at 8:05 pm #379490
Hi guys, I have question. Just doing financial analysis. Looking for reasons why ratios changed, what is the cause. I found many information in director / ceo report. But the problem is that I need other sources to support financial ratio movement. I want to avoid examiner comment that too much is based on annual report. The problem is when I am searching information in the internet (I am comparing Ryanair to Flybe) there are only most recent news. I am analysing statements 31March2014 to 31March2016. Can’t find historical news relevant to my period. When I searching website like reuters, financial times, the oldest one are usually from the middle of 2016. So my question is where you guys find commentaries to historical Financial Statements and articles.
I would highly appreciate advice.
March 29, 2017 at 2:45 pm #379542Is’nt topic 8 just An Evaluation of Business and Financial Performance of any Airlines?
Do we need to make an entire comparasion of the airlines we are making our project on with any.
I have just compared the financial statements not the entire business and environment.
I am making my project on Emirates Airlines and have comapred the financials statements with Qatar airways. Do i need to further talk about Qatar airways beyond its figures?I have used SWOT, PESTEL and Porters 5 forces but I have only talked about Emirates Airlines.
Do i need to research on Qatar Airways too?March 30, 2017 at 4:37 pm #379659Hi Trephena
I have been struggling with balance sheet ratios. Especially receivables/payables days etc. There just doesn’t seem to be any specific reasons for increase/decrease in receivables. What should we do?
March 31, 2017 at 1:02 am #379697@bik123 – in the business analysis there is more scope usually to use non-annual report sources than in the financial analysis. However as long as there are a few articles from trade journals or the business press in the financial analysis that will be fine.
What really gets the markers going off on one is when the ‘analysis’ reads like the notes to the accounts -mentioning derivative instruments when talking about current assets and loans and ‘explaining’ things with reference to figures from the accounts and not researched reasons. Use the CEO reports to trace trends and follow those trends through the 3 year period. As I have mentioned previously it is more useful to see the 3years as one long period rather than try to analyse most of it year by year individual figures. This is because management decisions cover more than one year and things don’t just stop each year end.
March 31, 2017 at 1:10 am #379698@Saheraden -that is about right regarding the models in theory. However remember that the PEST factors will normally often be cmmon to both companies e.g. if fuel prices are low all airlines will normally benefit.
Yes you do need to go beyond just stating figures the markers want to know how one company out performed the other not just by how much i.e. the reasons why / how they achieved this
March 31, 2017 at 1:18 am #379699@bal7722 – yes you have got it in one! (there often aren’t sensible reasons behind some of the ratios that make up liquidity). Remember the balance sheet is just a point in time and in addition airlines use very complex statistical models to manage cash flow often employing currency hedging and forward buying contracts (one of the reasons I think airlines are unsuitable for T15).
So focus on the other aspects, ratios and KPIs I have mentioned earlier in this thread
April 1, 2017 at 5:01 pm #379847thanks trephena for answer. Can someone explain me what below paragraph from Flybe 2015 FS means? This 10.2 worsened net margin position of company and I want to elaborate on that. Why such loan is retranslated, what is purpose?Thanks
Net finance costs
Net finance costs worsened by £(10.2)m due to
a non-cash, non-underlying movement on the
retranslation of US Dollar denominated debt used
to fund the acquisition of aircraft, particularly the
newer E175 regional jets, compared to a gain of
£8.3m in 2013/14.April 1, 2017 at 5:26 pm #379848my main company is emirates… But is cathay pacific an apt competitor for emirates?? i have almost completed part 3 but it would be better to know now than later. It might be possible that i would fail for not choosing an appropriate competitor. most of my friends compare emirates with singapore… but i want to choose something different to avoid the possibility that our projects might turn similar or even plagiarised
April 2, 2017 at 10:38 am #379877also the financial statements are presented differently. Emirates use total assets basis for presenting Statement of Financial Position and Cathay use net assets basis.
April 2, 2017 at 11:15 am #379878I would like to know if the following ratios/trends are enough to use for an airline and is there any possible addition to these.
Revenue growth and trend analysis
Operating profit margin
ROCE
Quick ratio
Accounts rec and payb days
Financial gearing
Interest cover
Total asset turnoverAnd I would like to know what to do if the company I am using has become unlisted since 2011 and now the group’s shares (i.e. those of a merged two airlines) trade on stock exchange.
So now I can certainly not use the group’s share prices. So will it okay to skip investor ratios or use those which dont involve use of share price ( and if so which ones do u recommend)April 2, 2017 at 11:35 am #379880April 2, 2017 at 1:04 pm #379883@trephena I have a question, could you recommend me some website where I will find average ratio for aviation industry. I am analysing interest cover of ryanair ad want to make some comparison. I would appreciate your help, can’t find anything in the web.
April 2, 2017 at 1:24 pm #379888@abdulbasit16 said:
I would like to know if the following ratios/trends are enough to use for an airline and is there any possible addition to these.Revenue growth and trend analysis
Operating profit margin
ROCE
Quick ratio
Accounts rec and payb days
Financial gearing
Interest cover
Total asset turnoverAnd I would like to know what to do if the company I am using has become unlisted since 2011 and now the group’s shares (i.e. those of a merged two airlines) trade on stock exchange.
So now I can certainly not use the group’s share prices. So will it okay to skip investor ratios or use those which dont involve use of share price ( and if so which ones do u recommend)If you had read above posts in this thread, then you would know that acc payable and acc receivable days aren’t appropriate for a service industry – even marker laughs at this. You don’t get credit period from airline, do you? For Quick ratio – replace it with Current ratio.
You can skip investor ratio – I did in my report, but make sure that you cover atleast 4 areas out of 5.
1) Profitability analysis
2) Liquidity
3) Gearing
4) Efficiency
5) InvestorRegards
April 2, 2017 at 1:36 pm #379890Indeed it is service industry but my primary company’s ‘trade payables’ are very high like around 4billion pounds so I thought it would be good to comment on those. Anyways I will think over this.
But if I skip investor ratios and efficiency as well coz efficiency ratios that can be used are the rec and payable days only for service industries, I will only be left with 3 types of ratios i.e. profitability, liquidity and gearing
April 2, 2017 at 1:40 pm #379891Any reason for using current instead of quick ratio? @ehsan
Coz service industries dont sell inventory and even if there is some inventory it is very immaterial…having almost no effect on the ratios.April 2, 2017 at 8:42 pm #379946@abdulbasit16 Exactly -airline inventory is immaterial as it is not part of the normal trading activities e.g. there is no real added value attached to it (as in retail). It has to be borne in mind that most elements of the current ratio are not as straightforward for an airline as in most industries which we try to get across. Trends in free cash flow are more appropriate really, if available.
So both Ehsan and I advise that no attention is paid to calculating the Quck ratio (acid test) SEPARATELY as it is a waste of time (and words). Whilst technically you are right the quick ratio probably is more appropriate than the current ratio however most students I suspect would not feel comfortable with being told to do it in place of the current ratio. I feel they see it as logically coming after the current ratio so they would still want to do both! (As the the difference between the current and quick ratios is fairly negligible for a service industry the net result is not significant)
But an interesting point you have raised -so perhaps we can now convince them that technically the quick ratio is more relevant than the current but NOT to present both! 🙂
April 2, 2017 at 9:28 pm #379948Alright.
Any comments regarding rest of my ratios. Are they enough? @trephena
April 3, 2017 at 7:52 pm #380023Can you please advise whether to use Restated figures from annual reports or use original ones? e.g. 2015 annual report consists 2014’s restated figures so when doing financial analysis is it better to use restated figures of year 2014 from 2015 annual report or use original figures from 2014 annual report?
Thanks
April 4, 2017 at 9:39 am #380063@trephena, also for ROCE
Can we use Total equity + “Total” debt (both long and short term) as Capital Employed?
When I use long term debt + total equity then ROCE is very different to airline’s own computation.April 4, 2017 at 9:53 am #380065@hassansualeh said:
@trephenaCan you please advise whether to use Restated figures from annual reports or use original ones? e.g. 2015 annual report consists 2014’s restated figures so when doing financial analysis is it better to use restated figures of year 2014 from 2015 annual report or use original figures from 2014 annual report?
Thanks
It depends, whether restated figures are material and the reason. I didn’t use restated figures in my analysis as it made very difficult to align my analysis with external sources as they depend on non-stated figures. Nevertheless, my restatement was very immaterial – affected profit by 1 million and the reasons were changes in IAS/IFRS which I discarded.
Changes in IAS/IFRS can have material affect, so I would recommend if the changes are made due to this reason then don’t discard like me – I was lazy, and might have gotten lucky that marker didn’t give it consideration.
But, I believe that it all comes to materiality
Regards,
EhsanApril 4, 2017 at 9:55 am #380066@abdulbasit16 said:
Alright.Any comments regarding rest of my ratios. Are they enough? @trephena
Use ASK, RPK, Yield and Load factor for revenue and profit analysis.
April 4, 2017 at 10:01 am #380067@hassansualeh said:
@trephena, also for ROCECan we use Total equity + “Total” debt (both long and short term) as Capital Employed?
When I use long term debt + total equity then ROCE is very different to airline’s own computation.Any widely accepted version of a ratio is accepted – Just make sure that u state the formula in your work.
April 4, 2017 at 1:34 pm #380079I am doing an analysis on Emirates Airlines.
Could anyone please advise on the appropriate comparator?
There are issues obtaining the annual reports of Etihad and Qatar as they both aren’t listed.
American airlines have year end of December whereas Emirates has an year end of March.
I was thinking of Singapore Airlines but Singapore airlines group consists of both full service airlines such as Silk Air and low cost airlines such as Tiger airline as a part of the group so I am worried if analysis will be appropriate?
I am panicking about this from almost a month. Please help.
April 4, 2017 at 2:44 pm #380086I am also confused about which years to compare.
The year ends which are to be taken for May 17 submission are y.e. 2014,2015 and 2016.
So the growth comparisions should be only between 2014 and 2015, 2015 and 2016?
Or do I need to consider growth from y.e. 2013 to y.e. 2014 as well?
April 4, 2017 at 4:29 pm #380101@ch305 said:
I am also confused about which years to compare.The year ends which are to be taken for May 17 submission are y.e. 2014,2015 and 2016.
So the growth comparisions should be only between 2014 and 2015, 2015 and 2016?
Or do I need to consider growth from y.e. 2013 to y.e. 2014 as well?
I did 2014 vs 2015 and 2015 vs 2016.
- AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.