• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free Notes, Lectures, Tests and Forums for ACCA and CIMA exams

  • ACCA
  • CIMA
  • FIA
  • OBU
  • Books
  • Forums
  • Ask AI
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login
  • ACCA Forums
  • Ask ACCA Tutor
  • CIMA Forums
  • Ask CIMA Tutor
  • FIA
  • OBU
  • Buy/Sell Books
  • All Forums
  • Latest Topics

June 2025 ACCA Exam Results

Comments & Instant poll >>

20% off ACCA & CIMA Books

OpenTuition recommends the new interactive BPP books for June 2025 exams.
Get your discount code >>

urgent reply relating f9 required !

Forums › Technical Problems › urgent reply relating f9 required !

  • This topic has 0 replies, 1 voice, and was last updated 11 years ago by saulat.
Viewing 1 post (of 1 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • November 3, 2013 at 12:03 pm #144431
    saulat
    Member
    • Topics: 6
    • Replies: 5
    • ☆

    hey there, u said to post my querry here, n so am I. In f9 working cap management receivables early settlement discount topic, there is an interest saving on REDUCTION OF RECEIVABLES . the norm is to calculate fall in receivables i.e Current receivables with current days minus new receivables who takes discount plus who dont take discount . this net figure is the answer. like in WQZ question , current receivables 18000 minus (25% taking discount i.e $1800 plus 75% not taking discount i.e $10800 , total = $126000) so fall in receivables is $5400 !!!!!! same approach goes with Paislay Co question, KXP Co question,in all other questions and also in your Example 4 of working capital recevables . But in MARTON Co , they did’nt deduct new recevables (50% who takes up , 50% who dont take discount) with current recivables $4500. they just DIRECTLY COMPARED current recivables 4500 * 50% =2250 with 50% who take discount =438 thats it !!!!!!! (however the normal way should be they should add up 438 plus 2250 =2685 and deduct it by 4500 current receivables ! sir , Why this CONTRADICTORY method is used in MARTON? i am clear by the calculation, concept and arithematic , but MARTON is making me so confused ? plz resolve my issue THANKYOU

  • Author
    Posts
Viewing 1 post (of 1 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
Log In

Primary Sidebar

Donate
If you have benefited from our materials, please donate

ACCA News:

ACCA My Exam Performance for non-variant

Applied Skills exams is available NOW

ACCA Options:  “Read the Mind of the Marker” articles

Subscribe to ACCA’s Student Accountant Direct

ACCA CBE 2025 Exams

How was your exam, and what was the exam result?

BT CBE exam was.. | MA CBE exam was..
FA CBE exam was.. | LW CBE exam was..

Donate

If you have benefited from OpenTuition please donate.

PQ Magazine

Latest Comments

  • mub@chits on The Statement of Financial Position and Income Statement (part a) – ACCA Financial Accounting (FA) lectures
  • mub@chits on The Statement of Financial Position and Income Statement (part a) – ACCA Financial Accounting (FA) lectures
  • MOSESP on Accountants and change – preparing for the future
  • bballhawk on Convertible debentures and derivatives – ACCA (SBR) lectures
  • saman66 on IFRS 5 – Discontinued operations – ACCA Financial Reporting (FR)

Copyright © 2025 · Support · Contact · Advertising · OpenLicense · About · Sitemap · Comments · Log in