• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free Notes, Lectures, Tests and Forums for ACCA and CIMA exams

  • ACCA
  • CIMA
  • FIA
  • OBU
  • Books
  • Forums
  • Ask AI
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login
  • ACCA Forums
  • Ask ACCA Tutor
  • FIA Forums
  • CIMA Forums
  • OBU Forums
  • Qualified Members forum
  • Buy/Sell Books
  • All Forums
  • Latest Topics

March 2026 ACCA Exams

Comments & Instant poll

20% off ACCA & CIMA Books

OpenTuition recommends the new interactive BPP books for June 2026 exams.
Get your discount code >>

urgent reply relating f9 required !

Forums › Technical Problems › urgent reply relating f9 required !

  • This topic has 0 replies, 1 voice, and was last updated 12 years ago by saulat.
Viewing 1 post (of 1 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • November 3, 2013 at 12:03 pm #144431
    saulat
    Member
    • Topics: 6
    • Replies: 5
    • ☆

    hey there, u said to post my querry here, n so am I. In f9 working cap management receivables early settlement discount topic, there is an interest saving on REDUCTION OF RECEIVABLES . the norm is to calculate fall in receivables i.e Current receivables with current days minus new receivables who takes discount plus who dont take discount . this net figure is the answer. like in WQZ question , current receivables 18000 minus (25% taking discount i.e $1800 plus 75% not taking discount i.e $10800 , total = $126000) so fall in receivables is $5400 !!!!!! same approach goes with Paislay Co question, KXP Co question,in all other questions and also in your Example 4 of working capital recevables . But in MARTON Co , they did’nt deduct new recevables (50% who takes up , 50% who dont take discount) with current recivables $4500. they just DIRECTLY COMPARED current recivables 4500 * 50% =2250 with 50% who take discount =438 thats it !!!!!!! (however the normal way should be they should add up 438 plus 2250 =2685 and deduct it by 4500 current receivables ! sir , Why this CONTRADICTORY method is used in MARTON? i am clear by the calculation, concept and arithematic , but MARTON is making me so confused ? plz resolve my issue THANKYOU

  • Author
    Posts
Viewing 1 post (of 1 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
Log In

Primary Sidebar

Kaplan ACCA Free Trial

Donate
If you have benefited from our materials, please donate

ACCA News:

ACCA My Exam Performance for non-variant

Applied Skills exams is available NOW

ACCA Options:  “Read the Mind of the Marker” articles

Subscribe to ACCA’s Student Accountant Direct

ACCA CBE Exams – Instant Poll

How was your exam, and what was the exam result?

BT CBE exam was.. | MA CBE exam was..
FA CBE exam was.. | LW CBE exam was..

Donate

If you have benefited from OpenTuition please donate.

PQ Magazine

Latest Comments

  • zurapirveli@gmail.com on Equity settled share based payments – goods – ACCA (SBR) lectures
  • Sid24012003 on Intangibles – Example 2 – ACCA Financial Reporting (FR)
  • Ken Garrett on CIMA BA1 Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient
  • Ana1674 on CIMA BA1 Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient
  • tehreem21 on MA Chapter 2 Questions Sources of Data

Copyright © 2026 · Support · Contact · Advertising · OpenLicense · About · Sitemap · Comments · Log in