- This topic has 3 replies, 2 voices, and was last updated 7 years ago by .
Viewing 3 posts - 1 through 3 (of 3 total)
Viewing 3 posts - 1 through 3 (of 3 total)
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
Interactive BPP books for September 2026 exams, recommended by OpenTuition.
Get discount code >>
Forums › Ask ACCA Tutor Forums › Ask the Tutor ACCA LW Exams › Unfair dismissal
Hi
Where an employee is dismissed on grounds which are Unfair (automatically unfair) such as trade union activities, does this protection apply even while the employee has only been employed a short time? I seem to have gotten slightly confused as at one point I was under the impression if the employee had less than two years experience they had no protection against any form of dismissal but now I think they do from unfair dismissal.
If the employer dismisses the employee within this period does any reason need to be given? Can’t they just say it’s redundancy (no longer required) to cover up the true reason?
If the dismissal is automatically unfair, the length of time of employment is irrelevant
Here’s a link to the website of citizens’ advice – about half way down the page there is specific mention of trade union membership (to address directly your example)
https://www.citizensadvice.org.uk/work/leaving-a-job/dismissal/check-if-your-dismissal-is-fair/
Specifically, here’s an extract from that webpage:
“If you think you were sacked because of an automatically unfair reason or discrimination, you can challenge your dismissal – it doesn’t matter how long you’ve worked there for.”
OK?
I believe the subtle difference is that between the expressions “automatically unfair” and, simply, “unfair”
My understanding is that, if it’s automatically unfair, the two year rule doesn’t apply
But if the unfair dismissal is not automatically unfair, but is nevertheless unfair, then the two year rule is applicable
OK?
