• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free Notes, Lectures, Tests and Forums for ACCA and CIMA exams

  • ACCA
  • CIMA
  • FIA
  • OBU
  • Books
  • Forums
  • Ask AI
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login
  • ACCA Forums
  • Ask ACCA Tutor
  • FIA Forums
  • CIMA Forums
  • OBU Forums
  • Qualified Members forum
  • Buy/Sell Books
  • All Forums
  • Latest Topics

Save 20% on ACCA & CIMA Books

Interactive BPP books for June 2026 exams, recommended by OpenTuition.
Get discount code >>

Transferable Amount of Personal Allowance

Forums › Ask ACCA Tutor Forums › Ask the Tutor ACCA TX-UK Exams › Transferable Amount of Personal Allowance

  • This topic has 4 replies, 2 voices, and was last updated 8 years ago by Avatarnitint.
Viewing 5 posts - 1 through 5 (of 5 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • November 4, 2017 at 6:25 am #414262
    Avatarnitint
    Participant
    • Topics: 25
    • Replies: 26
    • ☆☆

    Dear Sir,

    Is my understanding correct that 10% of the PA is a fixed amount and not the maximum amount?

    For example 11 of Chapter 2 if we assume for a moment that David had a trading income of £10,000 (instead of £8,000 in the notes) and Victoria received a salary of £30,000.

    In this case is it possible for David to transfer the unused PA of £1000 to Victoria or the question of transfer will only arise when the unused PA is greater than or equal to £1100?

    Many thanks Sir.

    Regards,
    Nitin

    November 5, 2017 at 11:17 am #414409
    AvatarTax Tutor
    Member
    • Topics: 2
    • Replies: 3960
    • ☆☆☆☆☆

    The election is for the fixed amount of 10% – hence 1100 – irrespective of the unused amount!

    November 9, 2017 at 9:41 am #414964
    Avatarnitint
    Participant
    • Topics: 25
    • Replies: 26
    • ☆☆

    Are you saying if David had a trading income of £10,000 and Victoria received a salary of £30,000, David can still transfer 1100 of his PA to Victoria?

    This would mean that both the partners together will benefit from 22100 PA instead of 22000.

    November 11, 2017 at 2:43 pm #415266
    AvatarTax Tutor
    Member
    • Topics: 2
    • Replies: 3960
    • ☆☆☆☆☆

    No it would not – look back at the answer to the example and you will see that David will get a PA of 9,900 so will have taxable income of 100 – also note we do not transfer the unused PA – we transfer a tax deduction of 220

    November 12, 2017 at 8:52 am #415335
    Avatarnitint
    Participant
    • Topics: 25
    • Replies: 26
    • ☆☆

    Thank you Sir. I now understand what I was missing. You have made it so easy to understand the topics for an overseas student like myself.

  • Author
    Posts
Viewing 5 posts - 1 through 5 (of 5 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
Log In

Primary Sidebar

ACCA News:

ACCA My Exam Performance for non-variant

Applied Skills exams is available NOW

ACCA Options:  “Read the Mind of the Marker” articles

Subscribe to ACCA’s Student Accountant Direct

ACCA CBE Exams – Instant Poll

How was your exam, and what was the exam result?

BT CBE exam was.. | MA CBE exam was..
FA CBE exam was.. | LW CBE exam was..

Donate

If you have benefited from OpenTuition please donate.

PQ Magazine

Latest Comments

  • TEDI on IAS 16 Property, plant and equipment – Initial Recognition – CIMA F1 Financial Reporting
  • ChanNV on Framework – measurement – ACCA Financial Reporting (FR)
  • ChanNV on IASB Conceptual Framework – Introduction – ACCA Financial Reporting (FR)
  • Konstantinos43 on Financial Performance Measurement – Liquidity Measures – ACCA Management Accounting (MA)
  • Hirak.5 on ACCA TX-UK FA2025 Chapter 3 Property Income and Investments – Individuals

Copyright © 2026 · Contact · Advertising · OpenLicense · About · Sitemap · Privacy Policy · Cookie settings · Comments · Log in