• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free Notes, Lectures, Tests and Forums for ACCA and CIMA exams

  • ACCA
  • CIMA
  • FIA
  • OBU
  • Books
  • Forums
  • Ask AI
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login
  • ACCA Forums
  • Ask ACCA Tutor
  • CIMA Forums
  • Ask CIMA Tutor
  • FIA
  • OBU
  • Buy/Sell Books
  • All Forums
  • Latest Topics

20% off ACCA & CIMA Books

OpenTuition recommends the new interactive BPP books for March and June 2025 exams.
Get your discount code >>

Transfer Pricing

Forums › ACCA Forums › ACCA APM Advanced Performance Management Forums › Transfer Pricing

  • This topic has 6 replies, 4 voices, and was last updated 9 years ago by daka1.
Viewing 7 posts - 1 through 7 (of 7 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • April 22, 2015 at 11:13 am #242167
    daka1
    Member
    • Topics: 5
    • Replies: 8
    • ☆

    Hi. I am finding it hard to understand Transfer Pricing as i never did F5 (exempt). Does any one have a step by step solution as to how to tackle a Typical TP question? i have the basic knowledge but the calculation part seems a bother.

    April 28, 2015 at 10:12 am #243047
    Suleimenov
    Member
    • Topics: 0
    • Replies: 4
    • ☆

    Hello!

    There is wondefull tech article on acca website.
    Questions: Landual Lamps (June 13 session) and SSA group (Dec 09)

    May 24, 2015 at 3:44 pm #248446
    fairlygladys
    Member
    • Topics: 9
    • Replies: 33
    • ☆

    It exists when selling internally within the organisation of different division/business unit across boundaries. It impacted to the global tax effect for a global organisation as well as the performance of the BU manager or division manager. Generally maximum TP is the willing purchase price to be accepted by the buying party and the minimum TP is the willing selling price to be agreed by the selling party. Says division A sells to division B. Material cost $100, variable cost $ 30, fixed cost $ 5. A sells to external customer $160. B can purchase from external supplier is $165. B sells to customer $200.

    If A sells to B $130 at cost, A earn nothing lots fixed cost $5 but B earn $70. It’s unfair to A and A will not be considered in selling to B as A can sell $160 with a profit of $25 after deducted the fixed cost.

    If A sells to B $160 at market price, A earn a profit of $25 while B earn $40. This seems to be fair to both A & B. A still get the same pay as selling to external customer while B is getting a lower purchase price from external supplier by $5 lower.

    The profit earn for a company as whole still no impact as earning $65 ($200 – $135) it just the profit sharing in between A & B of the organisation.

    The minimum TP = A’s selling price, ie. $160 market price
    The maximum TP = B’s purchase price, ie. $165 market price

    I suppose this is something about transfer pricing. Please correct me if I’m wrong.

    May 29, 2015 at 6:59 pm #250315
    tonds
    Participant
    • Topics: 0
    • Replies: 9
    • ☆

    How does it have an impact to the global tax effect.What if be has its own internal cost Say $20.

    May 29, 2015 at 7:01 pm #250317
    tonds
    Participant
    • Topics: 0
    • Replies: 9
    • ☆

    Sorry i meant division B having its internal cost.

    May 30, 2015 at 3:43 am #250406
    fairlygladys
    Member
    • Topics: 9
    • Replies: 33
    • ☆

    Says, A tax rate is 25% while B tax rate is 20%. Higher profit made by A will paying a higher tax to the local authority while B has a better tax advantage. At consolidate level, company is making a higher tax pay and given a lower net profit. This happen for global organisation where A and B at different country/state taxable profit at different tax rate.

    The maximum TP accepted by B is not impacted by its internal cost. For division B, they still at a lower purchase cost to buy from A. However, there may perhaps intervention from HQ to have A lower the transfer price to B.

    If B internal cost at $20, end up A earn $25 while B earn $20. As above, A tax rate is higher than B by 5%, meaning to say that when consolidated at corporate, will be paying higher tax which suppose maximum B profit will pay lower tax as compared to A.
    Tax payable
    A = $25 x 25% = $ 6.25
    B = $20 x 20% = $ 4.00
    Company tax payable = $10.25

    Says HQ placing TP policy only 10% at total cost.
    A sells to B = $148.50
    Profit = $13.50
    Tax payable = $ 3.375

    B sells to customer = $200
    Profit = $31.50 ($200 – $168.50)
    Tax payable = $6.30

    Company tax payable = $9.675

    May 30, 2015 at 8:43 am #250431
    daka1
    Member
    • Topics: 5
    • Replies: 8
    • ☆

    this is really helpful guys,on my way to understanding it better in time for september

  • Author
    Posts
Viewing 7 posts - 1 through 7 (of 7 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
Log In

Primary Sidebar

Donate
If you have benefited from our materials, please donate

ACCA News:

ACCA My Exam Performance for non-variant

Applied Skills exams is available NOW

ACCA Options:  “Read the Mind of the Marker” articles

Subscribe to ACCA’s Student Accountant Direct

ACCA CBE 2025 Exams

How was your exam, and what was the exam result?

BT CBE exam was.. | MA CBE exam was..
FA CBE exam was.. | LW CBE exam was..

Donate

If you have benefited from OpenTuition please donate.

PQ Magazine

Latest Comments

  • mrjonbain on Professionalism, ethical codes and the public interest – ACCA Strategic Business Leader (SBL)
  • mrjonbain on Professionalism, ethical codes and the public interest – ACCA Strategic Business Leader (SBL)
  • kemo1000 on Financial instruments – convertible debentures – ACCA Financial Reporting (FR)
  • barbjohn on Equity Law, Ratio Decidendi – ACCA LW Global
  • Kakui on Equity Law, Ratio Decidendi – ACCA LW Global

Copyright © 2025 · Support · Contact · Advertising · OpenLicense · About · Sitemap · Comments · Log in