• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free Notes, Lectures, Tests and Forums for ACCA and CIMA exams

  • ACCA
  • CIMA
  • FIA
  • OBU
  • Books
  • Forums
  • Ask AI
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login
  • ACCA Forums
  • Ask ACCA Tutor
  • CIMA Forums
  • Ask CIMA Tutor
  • FIA
  • OBU
  • Buy/Sell Books
  • All Forums
  • Latest Topics

20% off ACCA & CIMA Books

OpenTuition recommends the new interactive BPP books for September 2025 exams.
Get your discount code >>

traditional theory of financial mgt

Forums › Ask ACCA Tutor Forums › Ask the Tutor ACCA AFM Exams › traditional theory of financial mgt

  • This topic has 7 replies, 2 voices, and was last updated 9 years ago by John Moffat.
Viewing 8 posts - 1 through 8 (of 8 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • July 8, 2015 at 2:24 pm #260110
    anonymous
    Member
    • Topics: 17
    • Replies: 31
    • ☆

    Under this theory, it explains that debt can be introduced and is cheap only till the optimal point of gearing. And after this point, debt is no longer cheap. The reason for debt to not be cheap after the optimal point is because the company is already highly geared by the time it reaches the optimal point and so the banks would charge a very high rate of interest to compensate for the risk the bank takes in giving debt to a highly geared co. Is this right Sir? It is my way of thinking.Is it right?

    Secondly, debt is tax-deductible. For eg, investors reqd. return is 8% and the cost to the company would be 6% post tax { kd(1-t) }.
    Here in this eg, the cost to co. is reduced because debt is given tax relief.
    My doubt is, would the investors be given 8% as their return or 6%? If 6% is given, who will give the remaining 2%, as the investors have given the debt with the promise that they will be given 8%…

    July 8, 2015 at 2:56 pm #260113
    anonymous
    Member
    • Topics: 17
    • Replies: 31
    • ☆

    Sir, where all do we assume debt is risk free? Is it only in ‘ ungearing betas’ and ‘Modigliani’ questions?

    July 8, 2015 at 3:24 pm #260125
    John Moffat
    Keymaster
    • Topics: 57
    • Replies: 54699
    • ☆☆☆☆☆

    The traditional theory of gearing is that there is a level of gearing at which the WACC is a minimum (and therefore the market value is a maximum). However, it is not because the banks will charge a high rate of interest. It is because the shareholders will require a higher return because of the higher risk, and there comes a time when the higher return required is greater than the benefit of the cheaper debt.

    Debt is tax deductible for the company (not for the lender). So the lender will still be paid 8%. However paying the interest will save the company tax and the net cost to the company will therefore (in your example) only be 6%.

    In proving their theory, M&M assume that debt is risk free.
    As regards calculations in the exam, it is only relevant when ungearing and gearing betas using the asset beta formula (which is in fact derived from M&M’s theories 🙂 )

    July 8, 2015 at 4:17 pm #260128
    anonymous
    Member
    • Topics: 17
    • Replies: 31
    • ☆

    Fully understood. Thank you so much. I enjoy all your lectures. I feel like saying it a million times. Your explanation is so logical..which is what I like the most!
    Thanks so much again.

    July 8, 2015 at 5:09 pm #260155
    anonymous
    Member
    • Topics: 17
    • Replies: 31
    • ☆

    This doubt is from the lecture impact of financing, example 2.
    part b, There it is mentioned thus: ‘without debt, wacc = 20%, with debt, wacc = 18 something%.’

    I was trying to figure out that wacc .
    equity-70% , debt- 30%

    cost of capital of equity- 20%

    cost of capital of debt- 3.5%
    [kd=i(1-t)/P0 = 1.5(1-0.3)/30]

    so wacc of equity= 14, wacc of debt= 1.05
    Total wacc= 15.05%

    I am not getting 18% or so….:(

    July 8, 2015 at 5:34 pm #260167
    John Moffat
    Keymaster
    • Topics: 57
    • Replies: 54699
    • ☆☆☆☆☆

    You cannot take a WACC approach for this question. It is an adjusted present value question.
    Here the cost of equity of 20% is the cost of equity if there was no gearing (and the tax benefit of debt is added separately).

    The actual cost of equity would be higher than 20% because of the gearing.

    We can only use the WACC to appraise if the gearing of the company remains unchanged.

    July 8, 2015 at 5:44 pm #260178
    anonymous
    Member
    • Topics: 17
    • Replies: 31
    • ☆

    ok…thank you.

    July 8, 2015 at 9:06 pm #260246
    John Moffat
    Keymaster
    • Topics: 57
    • Replies: 54699
    • ☆☆☆☆☆

    You are welcome 🙂

  • Author
    Posts
Viewing 8 posts - 1 through 8 (of 8 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
Log In

Primary Sidebar

Donate
If you have benefited from our materials, please donate

ACCA News:

ACCA My Exam Performance for non-variant

Applied Skills exams is available NOW

ACCA Options:  “Read the Mind of the Marker” articles

Subscribe to ACCA’s Student Accountant Direct

ACCA CBE 2025 Exams

How was your exam, and what was the exam result?

BT CBE exam was.. | MA CBE exam was..
FA CBE exam was.. | LW CBE exam was..

Donate

If you have benefited from OpenTuition please donate.

PQ Magazine

Latest Comments

  • julio99 on Impairments – Impairment (CGU) – ACCA Financial Reporting (FR)
  • effy.sithole@gmail.com on EPS – diluted EPS Example – ACCA Financial Reporting (FR)
  • Ken Garrett on The Finance Function in the Digital Age – CIMA E1
  • DeborahProspect on ACCA SBR Specimen Exam 2 Question 1
  • darshan.69 on Chapter 9 Pension Schemes TX-UK FA2023

Copyright © 2025 · Support · Contact · Advertising · OpenLicense · About · Sitemap · Comments · Log in