Tort 2Forums › Ask ACCA Tutor Forums › Ask the Tutor ACCA LW Exams › Tort 2This topic has 1 reply, 2 voices, and was last updated 7 years ago by MikeLittle.Viewing 2 posts - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)AuthorPosts January 4, 2018 at 5:03 pm #427258 humaiParticipantTopics: 757Replies: 248☆☆☆☆☆Ok. But Sir was the pregnant women considered as neighbour of the motorcyclist?In Donoghue V Stevenson, Mrs Donoghue was considered as neighbour of the beer manufacturer na? January 4, 2018 at 6:44 pm #427268 MikeLittleKeymasterTopics: 27Replies: 23323☆☆☆☆☆No, the pregnant woman was NOT the neighbourThe difference between Bourhill and Donohue is that Stevenson was not manufacturing goods for human consumption.OK?AuthorPostsViewing 2 posts - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)The topic ‘Tort 2’ is closed to new replies.