• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free Notes, Lectures, Tests and Forums for ACCA and CIMA exams

  • ACCA
  • CIMA
  • FIA
  • OBU
  • Books
  • Forums
  • Ask AI
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login
  • ACCA Forums
  • Ask ACCA Tutor
  • FIA Forums
  • CIMA Forums
  • OBU Forums
  • Qualified Members forum
  • Buy/Sell Books
  • All Forums
  • Latest Topics

Save 20% on ACCA & CIMA Books

Interactive BPP books for June 2026 exams, recommended by OpenTuition.
Get discount code >>

through put accounting

Forums › Ask ACCA Tutor Forums › Ask the Tutor ACCA PM Exams › through put accounting

  • This topic has 3 replies, 2 voices, and was last updated 1 year ago by AvatarIAW3005.
Viewing 4 posts - 1 through 4 (of 4 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • May 26, 2024 at 10:55 am #706043
    Avatarsooha
    Participant
    • Topics: 70
    • Replies: 82
    • ☆☆

    Q 57 Kaplan/

    i understand how they answer the question, base on the answer P is the bottleneck recourse,
    but the question provide other information which is the time each unit take in each process which is
    0.2 in process P and 0.3 in process Q
    if i used this information Q will be the bottleneck
    P_ 6 x 8 x 90% = 43.2/0.2 = 216
    Q_ 9 x 6 x 85% = 45.9/0.3 = 153

    how do i know when i should stop, it didn’t accrue to me to take only the general hour for each machines ?

    May 26, 2024 at 11:45 am #706049
    AvatarIAW3005
    Keymaster
    • Topics: 4
    • Replies: 1615
    • ☆☆☆☆☆

    When determining the bottleneck, you should consider both the general output per hour and the time each unit takes in each process. The process with the lowest capacity (units per hour) is the bottleneck.

    By
    Calculate the output per hour for each process
    Determine the time each unit takes in each process
    Calculate the maximum units each process can handle per hour

    Process Q can handle fewer units per hour (153 units) compared to Process P (216 units). Therefore, Process Q is the bottleneck.

    May 26, 2024 at 2:22 pm #706061
    Avatarsooha
    Participant
    • Topics: 70
    • Replies: 82
    • ☆☆

    thank you for explaining, that how i approached it , however the answers in Kaplan p is the bottleneck

    The first step is to identify the bottleneck.
    Process P output is 6 × 8 × 0.9 = 43.2 per hour. Process Q output is 9 × 6 × 0.85 = 45.9 per
    hour. In the absence of other information, then process P is slower, and so is the bottleneck.

    May 26, 2024 at 3:19 pm #706063
    AvatarIAW3005
    Keymaster
    • Topics: 4
    • Replies: 1615
    • ☆☆☆☆☆

    My apologies
    I am out without access to anything other than my phone
    So I cannot check the Kaplan answer
    I have told you how to do the question
    For your information I was using the information that you had provided!

  • Author
    Posts
Viewing 4 posts - 1 through 4 (of 4 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
Log In

Primary Sidebar

ACCA News:

ACCA My Exam Performance for non-variant

Applied Skills exams is available NOW

ACCA Options:  “Read the Mind of the Marker” articles

Subscribe to ACCA’s Student Accountant Direct

ACCA CBE Exams – Instant Poll

How was your exam, and what was the exam result?

BT CBE exam was.. | MA CBE exam was..
FA CBE exam was.. | LW CBE exam was..

Donate

If you have benefited from OpenTuition please donate.

PQ Magazine

Latest Comments

  • TEDI on IAS 16 Property, plant and equipment – Initial Recognition – CIMA F1 Financial Reporting
  • ChanNV on Framework – measurement – ACCA Financial Reporting (FR)
  • ChanNV on IASB Conceptual Framework – Introduction – ACCA Financial Reporting (FR)
  • Konstantinos43 on Financial Performance Measurement – Liquidity Measures – ACCA Management Accounting (MA)
  • Hirak.5 on ACCA TX-UK FA2025 Chapter 3 Property Income and Investments – Individuals

Copyright © 2026 · Contact · Advertising · OpenLicense · About · Sitemap · Privacy Policy · Cookie settings · Comments · Log in