- This topic has 2 replies, 3 voices, and was last updated 2 years ago by .
Viewing 3 posts - 1 through 3 (of 3 total)
Viewing 3 posts - 1 through 3 (of 3 total)
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
Interactive BPP books for June 2026 exams, recommended by OpenTuition.
Get discount code >>
Forums › Ask ACCA Tutor Forums › Ask the Tutor ACCA AFM Exams › Talam Co (June 2019)
Hi John,
The final assessment for Talam Co problem as per the suggested answer is:
The value of the Uwa Project based on just the initial NPV is a small negative amount of $(6,000) approximately (appendix 1).This would indicate that the project is not worth pursuing, although the result is very marginal. The offer from Honua Co, and the Jigu Project, using the real options method, gives an estimated value of $17,668,000 (appendix 2), which is positive and substantial. This indicates that the Uwa Project should be undertaken.
My question:
1. Shouldn’t the decision to accept be made based on value of real options + NPV of the project until year 2 ?(The real option is to sell from Year 3 and alternative use after sale).
2. If the NPV of project until year 2 is considered, the value of the project including the options would be (17,668,000 + negative 36.45 million) causing us to decide not to accept the project.
Thanks!
No. The examiners answer is correct. The options effectively are replacing the negative NPV in appendix 1.
Hello Sir,
For the Pa of the Jigu project, why was the value of $70m still discounted for year 4 when the $70m is already the PV of expected cashflows?
