• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free Notes, Lectures, Tests and Forums for ACCA and CIMA exams

  • ACCA
  • CIMA
  • FIA
  • OBU
  • Books
  • Forums
  • Ask AI
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login
  • ACCA Forums
  • Ask ACCA Tutor
  • CIMA Forums
  • Ask CIMA Tutor
  • FIA
  • OBU
  • Buy/Sell Books
  • All Forums
  • Latest Topics

20% off ACCA & CIMA Books

OpenTuition recommends the new interactive BPP books for March and June 2025 exams.
Get your discount code >>

Talam Co (June 2019)

Forums › Ask ACCA Tutor Forums › Ask the Tutor ACCA AFM Exams › Talam Co (June 2019)

  • This topic has 2 replies, 3 voices, and was last updated 1 year ago by Orogun.
Viewing 3 posts - 1 through 3 (of 3 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • December 1, 2022 at 8:17 pm #673076
    nachuvishnu
    Participant
    • Topics: 1
    • Replies: 0
    • ☆

    Hi John,
    The final assessment for Talam Co problem as per the suggested answer is:

    The value of the Uwa Project based on just the initial NPV is a small negative amount of $(6,000) approximately (appendix 1).This would indicate that the project is not worth pursuing, although the result is very marginal. The offer from Honua Co, and the Jigu Project, using the real options method, gives an estimated value of $17,668,000 (appendix 2), which is positive and substantial. This indicates that the Uwa Project should be undertaken.

    My question:
    1. Shouldn’t the decision to accept be made based on value of real options + NPV of the project until year 2 ?(The real option is to sell from Year 3 and alternative use after sale).
    2. If the NPV of project until year 2 is considered, the value of the project including the options would be (17,668,000 + negative 36.45 million) causing us to decide not to accept the project.

    Thanks!

    December 2, 2022 at 7:31 am #673094
    John Moffat
    Keymaster
    • Topics: 57
    • Replies: 54655
    • ☆☆☆☆☆

    No. The examiners answer is correct. The options effectively are replacing the negative NPV in appendix 1.

    June 8, 2023 at 12:02 pm #686497
    Orogun
    Participant
    • Topics: 0
    • Replies: 2
    • ☆

    Hello Sir,

    For the Pa of the Jigu project, why was the value of $70m still discounted for year 4 when the $70m is already the PV of expected cashflows?

  • Author
    Posts
Viewing 3 posts - 1 through 3 (of 3 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
Log In

Primary Sidebar

Donate
If you have benefited from our materials, please donate

ACCA News:

ACCA My Exam Performance for non-variant

Applied Skills exams is available NOW

ACCA Options:  “Read the Mind of the Marker” articles

Subscribe to ACCA’s Student Accountant Direct

ACCA CBE 2025 Exams

How was your exam, and what was the exam result?

BT CBE exam was.. | MA CBE exam was..
FA CBE exam was.. | LW CBE exam was..

Donate

If you have benefited from OpenTuition please donate.

PQ Magazine

Latest Comments

  • hhys on PM Chapter 4 Questions Environmental Management Accounting
  • singhjyoti on Conceptual Framework – ACCA SBR lecture
  • John Moffat on Time Series Analysis – ACCA Management Accounting (MA)
  • azubair on Time Series Analysis – ACCA Management Accounting (MA)
  • Gowri7 on Relevant cash flows for DCF Working capital (examples 2 and 3) – ACCA Financial Management (FM)

Copyright © 2025 · Support · Contact · Advertising · OpenLicense · About · Sitemap · Comments · Log in