- This topic has 1 reply, 2 voices, and was last updated 1 year ago by
.
Viewing 2 posts - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)
- Posts
Can this be applied in any scenario also, is it correct to use this reason for the substantive procedure?
• For a sample of a —-, agree it to the —- ledger account to confirm the completeness of the —-
—-: representing any account
I don’t think it will get you very far to try to rote learn procedures in this way. For completeness of purchases, for example, your starting point needs to be a sample of GRNs ….
-> purchase invoices -> purchase day book -> purchases/payables a/cs in general ledger (also individual a/cs in the payables ledger) -> trial balance -> financial statements
Viewing 2 posts - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.