• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free Notes, Lectures, Tests and Forums for ACCA and CIMA exams

  • ACCA
  • CIMA
  • FIA
  • OBU
  • Books
  • Forums
  • Ask AI
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login
  • ACCA Forums
  • Ask ACCA Tutor
  • FIA Forums
  • CIMA Forums
  • OBU Forums
  • Qualified Members forum
  • Buy/Sell Books
  • All Forums
  • Latest Topics

March 2026 ACCA Exams Results

Comments & Instant poll

Save 20% on ACCA & CIMA Books

Interactive BPP books for June 2026 exams, recommended by OpenTuition.
Get discount code >>

subsi’s intangible assets written off at acqui date

Forums › Ask ACCA Tutor Forums › Ask the Tutor ACCA FR Exams › subsi’s intangible assets written off at acqui date

  • This topic has 2 replies, 3 voices, and was last updated 13 years ago by MikeLittle.
Viewing 3 posts - 1 through 3 (of 3 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • April 17, 2012 at 3:34 am #52235
    QIN
    Member
    • Topics: 63
    • Replies: 176
    • ☆☆☆

    Hi Tutor, I cant understand June 2010’s Q1(Picant) about intangible asset of S. The condition is S wrote off software USD500 during post acquisition, why it will be added back in the consol’s group reserves of P? And why this USD500 was treated as F.V.adjustment at acqui date?

    April 17, 2012 at 4:27 am #96348
    Najiya
    Member
    • Topics: 1
    • Replies: 93
    • ☆☆

    https://opentuition.com/groups/f7-financial-reporting/forum/topic/recoverable-value/

    May 12, 2012 at 1:40 pm #96349
    MikeLittle
    Keymaster
    • Topics: 27
    • Replies: 23368
    • ☆☆☆☆☆

    To answer the second part of your question first, the 500,000 is deducted from the net assets as at date of acquisition because, per the question, “Picant’s directors believed the software to have no recoverable value at the date of acquisition” so it’s a fair value adjustment.

    Because it has been written off in the post-acquisition period, the post-acq profits have been decreased whereas the 500,000 should have been written off the pre-acq profits. So, at the same time as we are decreasing the pre-acq for the purposes of the goodwill calculation, we should also be increasing the post-acq ie, we are simply reallocating the expense from the post-acq to the pre-acq period

  • Author
    Posts
Viewing 3 posts - 1 through 3 (of 3 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
Log In

Primary Sidebar

ACCA News:

ACCA My Exam Performance for non-variant

Applied Skills exams is available NOW

ACCA Options:  “Read the Mind of the Marker” articles

Subscribe to ACCA’s Student Accountant Direct

ACCA CBE Exams – Instant Poll

How was your exam, and what was the exam result?

BT CBE exam was.. | MA CBE exam was..
FA CBE exam was.. | LW CBE exam was..

Donate

If you have benefited from OpenTuition please donate.

PQ Magazine

Latest Comments

  • billgates on The nature and structure of organisations – ACCA Paper BT
  • billgates on The nature and structure of organisations – ACCA Paper BT
  • sanayyaa on ACCA TX-UK FA2025 Chapter 23 Inheritance Tax
  • sanayyaa on ACCA TX-UK FA2025 Chapter 23 Inheritance Tax
  • Aadhi69 on Changes in group structure – step disposals – ACCA SBR lectures

Copyright © 2026 · Support · Contact · Advertising · OpenLicense · About · Sitemap · Comments · Log in