Forums › Ask CIMA Tutor Forums › Ask CIMA P3 Tutor Forums › Strategic questions and cyber risk
- This topic has 5 replies, 3 voices, and was last updated 4 months ago by Ken Garrett.
- AuthorPosts
- April 15, 2021 at 8:19 am #617688
Hi,
I have a couple of questions I just need help with, as well as understanding 🙂
1. Is forecasting a strategic implementation or strategic analysis? – could you explain reason for your answer please?
2. Does deciding on brand name fall under strategic choice? – could you explain reason for your answer please?
3. When teaching students a malware course but are worried it may turn them into hackers one day, should we still teach them how to write malware codes – could you explain reason for your answer please?
Thanks!
April 15, 2021 at 10:43 am #6177231 Usually forecasting would be part of gathering information needed to analyse an organisation’s position and hence to move to the strategic planning stage.
2 A brand name is much more likely to be an implementation step. Strategic choice would deal with what products we intend to produce; design, branding, logos and advertising are detailed implementation steps.
3 It depends on the type of course. If you are merely teaching people about the different types of malware to be aware of then they need no coding knowledge at all. So CIMA members need to be aware of the threats and how virus checkers and firewalls can be defences. No coding knowledge is needed. However, if you are going to teach people in detail about how malware works (perhaps they are technical IT people who need to be on the lookout for it) they would would certainly have to be able to read code. If you can read it you can write it. Determined hackers will learn it anyhow.
April 15, 2021 at 12:30 pm #617731Thank you for your response! very helpful!
I had another I was studying which made me think! – which would you say is the cheapest AND safest method of changeover between phased and pilot?
thanks!
April 15, 2021 at 3:23 pm #617758It completely depends on the system. Also they are not mutually exclusive so if you were carrying out a pilot in one subsidiary you might well decide to phase it in eg sales and receivables first.
Also, for a pilot approach you need to have several branches or companies that will use the same system – otherwise you are not really piloting anything.
July 12, 2024 at 10:39 pm #708280Do all of these changeover techniques have a high risk and that preparation is key to smoothness?
July 21, 2024 at 12:38 pm #708726Direct changeover is high risk. All the other methods attempt to reduce the risk to an acceptable level. For example, parallel running lets you monitor the performance of the new system against the old and maintains the old system for a period as a fallback in an emergency.
- AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.