Still confused in directors disqualification under model articles

The word “disqualify” is reserved for the context of a director being disqualified under the Company Directors Disqualification Act

Your use of the word is therefore incorrect and misleading

There is nothing in model articles about directors being disqualified – haw can there be … it’s for a Court to decide whether a director should be disqualified

There is, as I have already pointed out to you in an earlier response to this same question, article 18 within the model set that states:

“Termination of director’s appointment (note, this is NOT the same as disqualification)

18. A person ceases to be a director as soon as—
(a) that person ceases to be a director by virtue of any provision of the Companies Act 2006 or is prohibited from being a director by law;
(b) a bankruptcy order is made against that person;
(c) a composition is made with that person’s creditors generally in satisfaction of that
person’s debts;
(d) a registered medical practitioner who is treating that person gives a written opinion to the company stating that that person has become physically or mentally incapable of acting as a director and may remain so for more than three months;
(e) [paragraph omitted pursuant to The Mental Health (Discrimination) Act 2013]
(f) notification is received by the company from the director that the director is resigning from office, and such resignation has taken effect in accordance with its terms.”

I’ve given this some thought and I’ve decided that I can find no clearer way of answering you

I just hope that this time I have succeeded in explaining the situation to you clearly enough

OK?