• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free Notes, Lectures, Tests and Forums for ACCA and CIMA exams

  • ACCA
  • CIMA
  • FIA
  • OBU
  • Books
  • Forums
  • Ask AI
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login
  • ACCA Forums
  • Ask ACCA Tutor
  • FIA Forums
  • CIMA Forums
  • OBU Forums
  • Qualified Members forum
  • Buy/Sell Books
  • All Forums
  • Latest Topics

March 2026 ACCA Exams

Comments & Instant poll

20% off ACCA & CIMA Books

OpenTuition recommends the new interactive BPP books for June 2026 exams.
Get your discount code >>

Standard Deviation percentage increase

Forums › Ask ACCA Tutor Forums › Ask the Tutor ACCA MA – FIA FMA › Standard Deviation percentage increase

  • This topic has 3 replies, 2 voices, and was last updated 4 years ago by John Moffat.
Viewing 4 posts - 1 through 4 (of 4 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • April 15, 2021 at 12:17 pm #617730
    MPoul
    Member
    • Topics: 8
    • Replies: 6
    • ☆

    Dear John,
    Firstly thanks a lot for providing us with all these resources. Very appreciated.

    I am having issues understanding the tail end probability. I have looked at Ask the Tutor to see if this question was asked before but couldn’t find it. Apologies if it was.

    ex: normal distributed with a mean of 8kg and st.dev of 0.02kg

    (a) if items whose weight lies outside the range 7.985 – 8.035kg are deemed to be faulty, what % of products would be faulty.

    * i have no problem with this part of the question, it is 26.67%.
    I thought i should write section (a) too to give you the full scenario.

    My issue is with b and c (if b is found then c would make sense too)

    (b) if it is required to reduce the % of items that are too heavy (with a weight over 8.035kg) to 2%, to what value must the mean be decreased, leaving all other factors unchanged.

    (c) if required to reduce the % of items that are too light (with weight below 7.985kg) to 2%, to what value must the standard deviation be decreased, leaving all factors unchanged.

    answer (b): The tail end probability of 2% corresponds to the table entry 48%, so the z value 2.05 so work back to calculate the mean 8.035-(2.05*0.02) = 7.994

    What does not make sense to me is that isn’t the percentage of items which are heavier than 8.035kg is 4.01% with the current mean of 8kg? (0.5-0.4599)= 0.0401

    isn’t this 4.01% the one that what we are trying to reduce to 2%?

    I can’t get my head around the answer “the tail end probability of 2% corresponds to the table entry 48% so the z value is 2.05”

    why is it 48%? is it because 50% – 2%=48%

    Apologies if i am being silly here. I have watched your free lectures and they all made sense and I like the way you are “explaining” the formulas so they make “sense” to us. This is exactly what I really need here. I just couldn’t understand this answer; it just didnt make sense to me. Would you mind helping me understand it?

    Thanks in advance
    Regards
    Mia

    April 15, 2021 at 4:09 pm #617763
    John Moffat
    Keymaster
    • Topics: 57
    • Replies: 54835
    • ☆☆☆☆☆

    Part (b) is asking to what value the mean needs to be changed (which is actually a rather ridiculous thing to ask because it is not normally in real life possible to change the mean!!).

    For the weight to be over 8.035kg with a probability of 2%, then the probability of being between the new mean and 9.035kg must be 48% (because 50% must be above the new mean).

    Working backwards in the tables, for a probability of 0.48, the z value must be 2.05.

    Therefore the distance between the new mean and 8.035 must be 2.05 x the standard deviation.

    April 15, 2021 at 4:41 pm #617769
    MPoul
    Member
    • Topics: 8
    • Replies: 6
    • ☆

    Everything makes sense when you explain it! Thanks very much! Really appreciated and thanks for replying.

    April 16, 2021 at 8:59 am #617848
    John Moffat
    Keymaster
    • Topics: 57
    • Replies: 54835
    • ☆☆☆☆☆

    You are welcome 🙂

  • Author
    Posts
Viewing 4 posts - 1 through 4 (of 4 total)
  • The topic ‘Standard Deviation percentage increase’ is closed to new replies.

Primary Sidebar

Kaplan ACCA Free Trial

Donate
If you have benefited from our materials, please donate

ACCA News:

ACCA My Exam Performance for non-variant

Applied Skills exams is available NOW

ACCA Options:  “Read the Mind of the Marker” articles

Subscribe to ACCA’s Student Accountant Direct

ACCA CBE Exams – Instant Poll

How was your exam, and what was the exam result?

BT CBE exam was.. | MA CBE exam was..
FA CBE exam was.. | LW CBE exam was..

Donate

If you have benefited from OpenTuition please donate.

PQ Magazine

Latest Comments

  • Breadtoast67 on Strategy formulation (Part 2) – ACCA (AFM) lectures
  • adatya on Auditors’ Rights, Appointment, Removal, Resignation and Regulation – ACCA Audit and Assurance (AA)
  • John Moffat on Inventory Control (part 1) The EOQ Formula – ACCA Management Accounting (MA)
  • RuthlynE on FM Chapter 11 Questions – Sources of finance – equity
  • AllisonHoang on Inventory Control (part 1) The EOQ Formula – ACCA Management Accounting (MA)

Copyright © 2026 · Support · Contact · Advertising · OpenLicense · About · Sitemap · Comments · Log in