• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free Notes, Lectures, Tests and Forums for ACCA and CIMA exams

  • ACCA
  • CIMA
  • FIA
  • OBU
  • Books
  • Forums
  • Ask AI
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login
  • ACCA Forums
  • Ask ACCA Tutor
  • CIMA Forums
  • Ask CIMA Tutor
  • FIA
  • OBU
  • Buy/Sell Books
  • All Forums
  • Latest Topics

20% off ACCA & CIMA Books

OpenTuition recommends the new interactive BPP books for March and June 2025 exams.
Get your discount code >>

Standard costing – Fixed costs

Forums › Ask ACCA Tutor Forums › Ask the Tutor ACCA PM Exams › Standard costing – Fixed costs

  • This topic has 8 replies, 2 voices, and was last updated 1 year ago by LMR1006.
Viewing 9 posts - 1 through 9 (of 9 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • August 15, 2023 at 2:47 pm #689969
    kedeshw
    Participant
    • Topics: 10
    • Replies: 13
    • ☆

    Please look at this question from the latest examiners report:

    Example 2
    A company makes product M and to meet demand of 2,000 units, it has budgeted to
    use the following resources per unit of product X:

    Material A 1.2 kg at $10 per kg
    Material B 1.3kg at $9 per kg
    Labour 2.5 hours at $15 per hour

    Variable overheads are allocated at a rate of $5 per kg of material B used.

    Fixed overheads are $80,000 and are absorbed based on the quantity of material A
    used.
    What is the standard full cost per unit of product X (to two decimal places)?
    $ ____________

    ? The correct answer is $107.70
    The requirement asks for the standard full cost; therefore, all variable and fixed costs
    must be included. The direct costs of materials A and B and labour are
    straightforward to calculate from the information provided in the question. Variable
    overheads are based on the quantity of material B, so can be calculated as (1.3kg x
    $5) = $6.50. So, the total variable cost per unit is:
    $
    Material A 1.2 kg x $10 12.00
    Material B 1.3 kg x $9 11.70
    Labour 2.5 hours x $15 37.50
    Variable overheads 1.3 kg x $5 6.50
    Total variable cost 67.70

    Fixed overheads are given at a total level so fixed overhead per unit must be
    calculated, ($80,000/2,000) = $40 per unit.
    The standard full cost per unit of product M is therefore $67.70 + $40.00 = $107.70.

    My question is: Why are the fixed overheads not absorbed on the material A used as the question states but are instead absorbed per unit. The answer states because “fixed overheads are given a total level”. Please could you explain this?

    Kindest regards, and thank you in advance.
    Kedesh

    August 15, 2023 at 6:39 pm #689982
    LMR1006
    Keymaster
    • Topics: 4
    • Replies: 1496
    • ☆☆☆☆☆

    Because

    Fixed overheads are given at a total level so fixed overhead per unit must be
    calculated, ($80,000/2,000) = $40 per unit.

    The overhead costs are absorbed on a per unit basis because it allows for a more accurate allocation of costs.

    August 15, 2023 at 7:31 pm #689984
    kedeshw
    Participant
    • Topics: 10
    • Replies: 13
    • ☆

    Thank you for your response.

    I agree that fixed costs provide a better allocation of costs when absorbed on a per unit basis. However, when would you absorb over heads based on the quantity of Material A like the question said.. when there are is a step up in fixed costs?

    August 15, 2023 at 9:10 pm #689991
    LMR1006
    Keymaster
    • Topics: 4
    • Replies: 1496
    • ☆☆☆☆☆

    What do you do with absorption of overheads…….?

    Overheads can be absorbed into the cost of production on either a unit, machine hour or labour hour basis, depending on which is most appropriate.

    Why are you asking about a stepped up fixed costs?

    August 16, 2023 at 8:49 am #690024
    kedeshw
    Participant
    • Topics: 10
    • Replies: 13
    • ☆

    Good morning,

    Thank you, I got you! I was getting confused by the wording of the question but you reminded me absorption is based on whichever is most appropriate. I keep finding myself getting tripped up by the silliest of mistakes when practicing for this exam! I cant begin to explain how frustrating it is to get the more complex issues correct, but keep getting the more minor issues incorrect.
    Apologies for the silly question.

    Thank you again.

    August 16, 2023 at 9:09 am #690025
    kedeshw
    Participant
    • Topics: 10
    • Replies: 13
    • ☆

    Sorry, while i have you here may I ask one more question?
    The traditional way of dealing with limiting factors is to use limiting factor analysis whereby you work out the limiting factor and attach contribution per limiting resource per product produced.

    A modern approach to deal with this type of situation is throughput accounting whereby we find the bottleneck and attach a throughput per bottleneck resource per product produced.

    Unless explicitly told in the question, is there a way to know which approach I should be using in the question? Am I to look out for specific words like ‘bottleneck’ or ‘limiting resource’ within the question?

    August 16, 2023 at 10:08 pm #690057
    LMR1006
    Keymaster
    • Topics: 4
    • Replies: 1496
    • ☆☆☆☆☆

    So, if the question explicitly mentions terms like “throughput accounting” or “limiting factor analysis,” it is a clear indication of which approach to use. However, if the question does not specify, you can look for certain clues within the question to determine the appropriate approach.

    For throughput accounting, you can look for phrases like “maximising profit,” “optimal production plan,” or “bottleneck activity.” These indicate a focus on maximising throughput and identifying the bottleneck resource.

    On the other hand, for limiting factor analysis, you can look for phrases like “scarcity of resources,” “maximising contribution,” or “rank products.” These indicate a focus on optimising the utilisation of limited resources.

    August 17, 2023 at 6:57 pm #690102
    kedeshw
    Participant
    • Topics: 10
    • Replies: 13
    • ☆

    This was so helpful. Your knowledge is so impressive.
    Thank you so so much!

    August 17, 2023 at 10:10 pm #690123
    LMR1006
    Keymaster
    • Topics: 4
    • Replies: 1496
    • ☆☆☆☆☆

    You are most welcome

  • Author
    Posts
Viewing 9 posts - 1 through 9 (of 9 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
Log In

Primary Sidebar

Donate
If you have benefited from our materials, please donate

ACCA News:

ACCA My Exam Performance for non-variant

Applied Skills exams is available NOW

ACCA Options:  “Read the Mind of the Marker” articles

Subscribe to ACCA’s Student Accountant Direct

ACCA CBE 2025 Exams

How was your exam, and what was the exam result?

BT CBE exam was.. | MA CBE exam was..
FA CBE exam was.. | LW CBE exam was..

Donate

If you have benefited from OpenTuition please donate.

PQ Magazine

Latest Comments

  • bpop on Risk and uncertainty (part 2) – ACCA (AFM) lectures
  • kamo7293 on Financial performance – Example 2 – ACCA Financial Reporting (FR)
  • nevertoolate on CIMA BA2 – Regression analysis
  • Ken Garrett on The nature and structure of organisations – ACCA Paper BT
  • Ark1 on The nature and structure of organisations – ACCA Paper BT

Copyright © 2025 · Support · Contact · Advertising · OpenLicense · About · Sitemap · Comments · Log in