Hello,
I am wondering to what extent it is essential to explicitly name the ethical principle that was not obeyed (Specimen 1, Q3b) to gain a mark. E.g. if I write that the presentation of the survey results was biased, would it count as referring to the lack of objectivity and could get me a mark? To make my question more general - would a relevant point be enough or is it necessary to refer to the theory (model, principles, framework etc.) and explicitly name it to gain a mark?
Thank you for advice!
Ask the Tutor ACCA SBL
Specimen 1, Q3b) - do I need to name fundamental principles to gain a mark?
Ethics is a major component of this exam and the fundamental principles are the foundation of professional ethical behaviour, so you need to know what the principles are.
Sign in to reply to this topic.
