Skip to content

ACCA Forums

AFM*** September 2023 ACCA AFM exam – Instant Poll and comments ***

Oopentuition_teamAdmin3y ago
How was your September 2023 ACCA AFM exam? Vote in the Instant Poll
September 2023 ACCA AFM exam — historical results
(Comments will be opened after 5PM UK)
Kkazisizan3y ago#1
My first question was hedging, then merger and acq and finally ratio analysis
Kkeerthi3y ago#2
I had the same. what did you do about the hedging? Some of the premiums were missing
FFatima3y ago#3
I had Q1 APV and adjusted WACC, interest swap, Q2 business valuation Q3 ratio analysis evaluation . AFM morning session
SSamantha3y ago#4
I had the same morning questions but APV and NPV both got positive Ke 12% For swap I got 4.45% rate Valuations narrative on hostile takeover was tricky only white nights strategy I identified What anyone else wrote ?
SSamantha3y ago#5
Same here , how did you find it ?
RRoy3y ago#6
AFM is no joke. If I get a 50% pass on this paper, I am going to give a testimony at church.
Aaisha3y ago#7
Worst paper I’ve ever done, resit in December for sure ?
TTaye3y ago#8
I had the same but NPV got a negative(yes Ke 12%), then calculated APV and even adding tax benefits still gave a negative APV, so not sure if I had messed somewhere. Spent so much time on question A that I then messed up the other 2 questions, did not do ratio analysis on the last one just narrative , I don’t think I passed
CCindy3y ago#9
What came in the AFM exam: Q1. APV (21 marks!),discussion on methods of finance (there was info on an interest swap in the exhibit but I just realized now I don’t remember a question on it) Q2. Ratios, discussion on performance and trends Q3. Business Valuation with DVM, discussion on takeover defense strategies What I broke my head trying to learn: Hedging FX and Interest rate risk Free cash flows to the firm Reconstruction Bond Valuations Real Options Risk adjusted WACC International Investment Appraisal Freaking green finance haha *cries*
CConor3y ago#10
Was ok interest rate collar with net premium was the hedging, did Q3 ran out of time to get Q2 exam was a bit of a joke to be honest
FFatima3y ago#11
same ke 12% but negative npv and apv, business valuation, i did the writing part but not the calculation then did ratio analysis question for 30mins, i want to write more but run out of time. i hope i pass but i’l continue my AFM studying after 2 weeks break, just in case i need to retake in dec ??
FFatima3y ago#12
wished i studied business valutation abit more, there were easy marks i’ve missed (crycry) could be the few marks i need for a pass
ZJZonke Junior3y ago#13
I feel like ACCA robbed me of a pass
EElisa3y ago#14
I had APV 50 mark question as well. I am kicking myself, I seem to have messed up the ungeared Ke section. I don't know how, I had done it so many times. My result was 16% for some reason. Forgot to add back the tax depreciation as well. Don't think I got the swap right. I attempted the other 2 questions but probably didn't do enough for a pass given all the mistakes.
VVanessa3y ago#15
Delighted Q1 was on interest risk, options collars and swap. Q2 on acquisition done probably incorrectly but calculated the percentage in gain for shareholders but unfortunately 7 marks left on reverse takeover theory, very disappointing. Q3 full question on Ratios 10 marks calculations and 10 marks for theory. Strange question. Just praying for 50%! All the studies done to then write this paper is ridiculous.
TTemur3y ago#16
Q1 - APV for 21 marks!!! Got NPV and APV negative. KE 12%. Discussion of difference between APV and NPV and why APV is better. Investment decision. Q2 - BS PL analysis of firm with ratios and trends for 20 marks out of which 10 marks is given for ratios and trends. Also, it was required to identify/state missing information in order to expand the analysis. Q3 - Acquisition with free cash flow to equity. 2 scenarios from CEO and finance director (CEO seemed to be showing behavioral finance). Maximum amount to be paid to target's directors. Discussion of 3 strategies against the takeover provided by the directors of the target company (legitimacy and effectiveness) - finding competitor, some kind of questionnaire and legal obstacles by creating a negative assumptions on employees and clients.
TTaye3y ago#17
Just because no one mentioned about the swap, I got CBBR +1.7% after the swap which ended up being 5.70% .. it was asked to be calculated in the notes paper but not in an actual question. Also the Q2 on cash flow to equity valuation I didn’t not understand so left it blank. Did anyone attempt that?
Former userFormer user3y ago#18
I couldn't attend my AFM exam today due to some technical issues I have exam next week,the paper will be entirely different or similar? does anybody have experience with contingency exam? please reply
RRed3y ago#19
Can you elaborate more? This seems like a different paper set, most people got APV
RRed3y ago#20
Do you remember details?
BBobdddd3y ago#21
Yes, I got the same answer in swap, 0.3% benefit for each party. The overall APV is still negative after including subsidised loan, bank loan benefit and subsidised loan interest rate benfit.
FAFaraz Abid3y ago#22
Has anyone encounter this problem? 'Sorry, it's not possible to plan and book exam at this time. Please try again later.'
AAlex3y ago#23
I believe the exam was really hard Question number one was an APV calculation for 21 points with a possible interest SWAP and comments on managers view. I got a 12% cost of equity, negative NPV and positive APV after incorporation of subsidised loan finance and tax saving on normal loan interest. At the same time I feel i was not consistent enough - i calculated saving on subs loan versus rate on notmal loan, which was given as 6%, but at the same time SWAP resulted in a decrease of rate to 5.7% and I have caluclated tax saving on interest 5.7%, not 6%.. pehaps subs loan saving should have been calculated as well versus the updated rate (but in this case it would make no sense to discount it at 6%). At the same tine in requirement there was not separate question regarding the rates SWAP which is strange. Question 2 appeared to be very easy if you knew the Gordons growth model. I have totally forgotten about it and calculated the growth rate based on the given share price and given required investor return (which is not correct I believe). At the same time I dont understand how the marking scheme is working - If i Have failed to calculate correctly the market value of acquired company - all other calculations were based on an incorrect synergy effect of two companies, thus also incorrect. Is it still possible to get there some marks? I hope. When I arrived to the last question which was the ration question - I have only 25 minutes left which was not enough at all.. I tried to write some of comments on performance, gearing and liquidity and ran out of time. However looks like it was a question with easy marks. Hope for 50% at least, but at the same time not sure I will get those I also want to leave a feedback regarding the technical side of the exam. I am sorry, but CBE are awful. Excel in the exam is a total disaster. It is written somewhere that you can't add rows and columns, thus use Ctrl+x ctrl V to manage the composition of the sheet - but when you do it - all formulas are breaking. You can not freeze cells (F4), you can not review your formulas (F2), you can not select a range of cells and copy the formula inside. I feel like I have lost plenty of time on such not exam related activities, eventhough I have practised such sitting before. Wish everyone luck!
SSamantha3y ago#24
I experienced similar to Alex during exam , even the SUM function did not work , but on ACCA practice platform it did. Halfway through exam my laptop massively overheated but invigilator refused to allow a cooling pad although an adviser on the phone said it is allowed .Reported this to exam survey ACCA has sent. ACCA state they' d like us to get closer to real life workplace but provide limited excel so instead of focusing on contents abd analysis a finalist is wasting time on small exhibits and non existent formulas On the face of it , APV and ratios seems like very easy areas , but ratios are extremely time consuming ad the temptation is there to do it 100%. Valuations question theory part was not in line with syllabus except from the statement about approaching more sympathetic competitor, other two very generic rather than defence strategy specific so I linked to ethics and would be grateful if anyone new what exact strategies these 2 related too
Rrishabh3y ago#25
For apv which rate u took discounting ? As question was this time specific to use commercial borrowing rate and not risk free rate
Topic lockedNew replies are closed.