- This topic has 1 reply, 2 voices, and was last updated 9 years ago by .
Viewing 2 posts - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)
Viewing 2 posts - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
OpenTuition recommends the new interactive BPP books for September 2025 exams.
Get your discount code >>
Forums › Ask ACCA Tutor Forums › Ask the Tutor ACCA MA – FIA FMA › semi-variable costs
Dear sir,
In one of your lectures concerning the chapter semi variable costs, for the coefficient of determination, you have said that “96% of changes in one variable are explained by changes in the other” and you have also said something about 4%. I do have watched the lecture twice but still has not understand what you have said about the 96% and 4%.
Could you explain to me in wordings?
Thanks in advance.
If there was perfect correlation then the regression equation would work perfectly for every pair of observations – they would all lie exactly on a straight line.
If the coefficient of determination is 100% then this would be the case.
If the coefficient of determination is only 96% then it means that only for 96% of the pairs of observation does the regression equation work perfectly – for the other 4% of them it doesn’t.