• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free Notes, Lectures, Tests and Forums for ACCA and CIMA exams

  • ACCA
  • CIMA
  • FIA
  • OBU
  • Books
  • Forums
  • Ask AI
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login
  • ACCA Forums
  • Ask ACCA Tutor
  • FIA Forums
  • CIMA Forums
  • OBU Forums
  • Qualified Members forum
  • Buy/Sell Books
  • All Forums
  • Latest Topics

Save 20% on ACCA & CIMA Books

Interactive BPP books for June 2026 exams, recommended by OpenTuition.
Get discount code >>

Same procedure but different assetion tested

Forums › Ask ACCA Tutor Forums › Ask the Tutor ACCA AA Exams › Same procedure but different assetion tested

  • This topic has 2 replies, 2 voices, and was last updated 10 years ago by Avatarmansoor.
Viewing 3 posts - 1 through 3 (of 3 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • August 13, 2015 at 9:48 am #267047
    Avatarmansoor
    Participant
    • Topics: 423
    • Replies: 541
    • ☆☆☆☆

    1. inventory: cast the list showing categorized as raw matl, wip, finished goods to ensure arithmentical accuracy and agree totals to FS disclosures: verifies COMPLETENESS

    2. Recievables: obtain an aged listing, cast it to verify arithmetical accuracy and agree to FS: verifies VALUATION

    in both cases, a list being agreed to the FS.

    FURTHER, inventory and recvbles are both ACCOUNT BALANCES thus the key assertions are: completeness, existence, rights/obs, valuation/allocation.

    A. can we say the both the procedures test COMPLETENESS AND VALUATION?

    B. the difference between the two is that on refers to the disclosure in FS, but even in that case completion and valuation are key assertions.

    i guess i am asking why is there a difference in the assertion being tested when the procedure is essentially the same

    regards
    .

    August 14, 2015 at 12:30 pm #267155
    AvatarKen Garrett
    Keymaster
    • Topics: 10
    • Replies: 10659
    • ☆☆☆☆☆

    One procedure can help with more than one assertion. Eg inspection of a non-current asset can verify its existence (but not ownership) and also to give some insight into its valuation (eg if its all rusted up and not used its value should be Nil).

    August 14, 2015 at 12:38 pm #267158
    Avatarmansoor
    Participant
    • Topics: 423
    • Replies: 541
    • ☆☆☆☆

    but for the 2 procedures listed above …. what is the specific answer to my question which was:

    A. can we say the both the procedures test COMPLETENESS AND VALUATION?

  • Author
    Posts
Viewing 3 posts - 1 through 3 (of 3 total)
  • The topic ‘Same procedure but different assetion tested’ is closed to new replies.

Primary Sidebar

ACCA News:

ACCA My Exam Performance for non-variant

Applied Skills exams is available NOW

ACCA Options:  “Read the Mind of the Marker” articles

Subscribe to ACCA’s Student Accountant Direct

ACCA CBE Exams – Instant Poll

How was your exam, and what was the exam result?

BT CBE exam was.. | MA CBE exam was..
FA CBE exam was.. | LW CBE exam was..

Donate

If you have benefited from OpenTuition please donate.

PQ Magazine

Latest Comments

  • Princessss on AA Chapter 12 Questions
  • Arjunmullacheri on Introduction to Financial Accounting – ACCA Financial Accounting (FA) lectures
  • Bongi on Introduction to Working Capital – CIMA F1 Financial Reporting
  • AKareem on ACCA TX-UK FA2025 Chapter 14 Capital Gains Tax – Individuals – Reliefs
  • Breadtoast67 on Diversification – ACCA Strategic Business Leader (SBL)

Copyright © 2026 · Contact · Advertising · OpenLicense · About · Sitemap · Privacy Policy · Cookie settings · Comments · Log in