• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free Notes, Lectures, Tests and Forums for ACCA and CIMA exams

  • ACCA
  • CIMA
  • FIA
  • OBU
  • Books
  • Forums
  • Ask AI
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login
  • ACCA Forums
  • Ask ACCA Tutor
  • FIA Forums
  • CIMA Forums
  • OBU Forums
  • Qualified Members forum
  • Buy/Sell Books
  • All Forums
  • Latest Topics

Save 20% on ACCA & CIMA Books

Interactive BPP books for June 2026 exams, recommended by OpenTuition.
Get discount code >>

Routledge v McKay 1954

Forums › Ask ACCA Tutor Forums › Ask the Tutor ACCA LW Exams › Routledge v McKay 1954

  • This topic has 1 reply, 2 voices, and was last updated 8 years ago by AvatarMikeLittle.
Viewing 2 posts - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • January 13, 2018 at 7:37 pm #428935
    Avatarhumai
    Participant
    • Topics: 757
    • Replies: 248
    • ☆☆☆☆☆

    The facts: The defendant, in discussing the possible sale of his motorcycle to the claimant, said on 23 October that the cycle was a 1942 model; he took this information from the registration document. On 30 October the parties made a written contract which did not refer to the year of the model and the purchaser had not indicated that the age of the cycle was of critical importance to him. The actual date was 1930.

    Decision: The buyer’s claim for damages failed. The reference to a 1942 model was a representation made prior to the contract

    Sir here why the buyer’s claim for damages failed? Although we know that breach of representation results in damages and/or rescission.

    January 13, 2018 at 8:49 pm #428954
    AvatarMikeLittle
    Keymaster
    • Topics: 27
    • Replies: 23368
    • ☆☆☆☆☆

    This should explain the apparent anomaly …

    “Misrepresentation Act 1967 … An Act to amend the law relating to innocent misrepresentations and to amend sections 11 and 35 of the Sale of Goods Act 1893.”

    OK?

  • Author
    Posts
Viewing 2 posts - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)
  • The topic ‘Routledge v McKay 1954’ is closed to new replies.

Primary Sidebar

ACCA News:

ACCA My Exam Performance for non-variant

Applied Skills exams is available NOW

ACCA Options:  “Read the Mind of the Marker” articles

Subscribe to ACCA’s Student Accountant Direct

ACCA CBE Exams – Instant Poll

How was your exam, and what was the exam result?

BT CBE exam was.. | MA CBE exam was..
FA CBE exam was.. | LW CBE exam was..

Donate

If you have benefited from OpenTuition please donate.

PQ Magazine

Latest Comments

  • Bongi on Introduction to Working Capital – CIMA F1 Financial Reporting
  • AKareem on ACCA TX-UK FA2025 Chapter 14 Capital Gains Tax – Individuals – Reliefs
  • Breadtoast67 on Diversification – ACCA Strategic Business Leader (SBL)
  • Breadtoast67 on Diversification – ACCA Strategic Business Leader (SBL)
  • TEDI on IAS 16 Property, plant and equipment – Initial Recognition – CIMA F1 Financial Reporting

Copyright © 2026 · Contact · Advertising · OpenLicense · About · Sitemap · Privacy Policy · Cookie settings · Comments · Log in