Forums › Ask ACCA Tutor Forums › Ask the Tutor ACCA PM Exams › Robber – Exam Jun 2012
- This topic has 4 replies, 2 voices, and was last updated 7 years ago by John Moffat.
- AuthorPosts
- August 31, 2017 at 11:28 am #404622
In question 1 – Robber Jun 2012:
“Machine costs are semi-variable; the variable element relates to set up costs, which are based upon the number of batches made. The keypads’ machine has fixed costs of $4,000 per annum and the display screens’ machine has fixed costs of $6,000 per annum. Whilst both components are currently made in batches of 500, this would need to change, with immediate effect, to batches of 400”
With current annual VC provided by the question of $22k for keypads and $24k for display screens, I dont know why the VC for incremental cost of making in house equal to $22k * 500/ 400 and $26k*500/ 400 respectively. Please help me clarify this point.
If you dont have a full question of Robber Jun 2012, I will paste in the comment below.
Thanks and best regards.
August 31, 2017 at 11:31 am #404625From my view, I just think that
VC = $22k ~ batches of 500
So with the new batches of 400, VC should be = $22 * 400/ 500.As a result, I cannot understand the answer of ACCA.
August 31, 2017 at 11:34 am #404627Here is the full question
Robber Co manufactures control panels for burglar alarms, a very profitable product. Every product comes with a one year warranty offering free repairs if any faults arise in this period.
It currently produces and sells 80,000 units per annum, with production of them being restricted by the short supply of labour. Each control panel includes two main components – one key pad and one display screen. At present, Robber Co manufactures both of these components in-house. However, the company is currently considering
outsourcing the production of keypads and/or display screens. A newly established company based in Burgistan is keen to secure a place in the market, and has offered to supply the keypads for the equivalent of $4·10 per unit and the display screens for the equivalent of $4·30 per unit. This price has been guaranteed for two years.
The current total annual costs of producing the keypads and the display screens are:(Keypads; Display screens) respectively
Production (80,000; 80,000) unitsDirect materials (160; 116)
Direct labour (40; 60)
Heat and power costs (64; 88)
Machine costs (26; 30)
Depreciation and insurance costs (84; 96)
Total annual production costs (374; 390)Notes:
1. Materials costs for keypads are expected to increase by 5% in six months’ time; materials costs for display screens are only expected to increase by 2%, but with immediate effect.
2. Direct labour costs are purely variable and not expected to change over the next year.
3. Heat and power costs include an apportionment of the general factory overhead for heat and power as well as the costs of heat and power directly used for the production of keypads and display screens. The general apportionment included is calculated using 50% of the direct labour cost for each component and would be incurred irrespective of whether the components are manufactured in-house or not.
4. Machine costs are semi-variable; the variable element relates to set up costs, which are based upon the number of batches made. The keypads’ machine has fixed costs of $4,000 per annum and the display screens’ machine has fixed costs of $6,000 per annum. Whilst both components are currently made in batches of 500, this would need to change, with immediate effect, to batches of 400.
5. 60% of depreciation and insurance costs relate to an apportionment of the general factory depreciation and insurance costs; the remaining 40% is specific to the manufacture of keypads and display screens.Required:
(a) Advise Robber Co whether it should continue to manufacture the keypads and display screens in-house or whether it should outsource their manufacture to the supplier in Burgistan, assuming it continues to adopt a policy to limit manufacture and sales to 80,000 control panels in the coming year.August 31, 2017 at 11:59 am #404637Thank John, I got this point.
August 31, 2017 at 4:31 pm #404690Please do not type out full ACCA questions – it is breach of copyright and the ACCA gets upset. I have all of the past questions and so just giving the name, and the exam is enough.
If the make units in smaller batches then the number of batches will increase and therefore so will the cost. You have it as a lower cost!!
(Suppose they make 4,000 units. With batches of 500 each time there are 8 batches. With batches of 400 each time there are 10 batches (which is the same as 8 x 500/400).)
- AuthorPosts
- The topic ‘Robber – Exam Jun 2012’ is closed to new replies.