Forums › ACCA Forums › ACCA SBR Strategic Business Reporting Forums › Revaluation + Depreciation Help needed please (confused)
- This topic has 7 replies, 5 voices, and was last updated 12 years ago by Anonymous.
- AuthorPosts
- November 15, 2012 at 10:49 am #55341
Hi could someone please help me on the following .
Asset orginal cost $10,000 20×6 uel – 5 years
Asset now revalued to $12,000 20×8 – UEL Remaining 3 yearsWhy would we not account for the increase of $2,000 aS Revaluation surplus .
Ans shows that – 20×8 Dr Asset (sofp) (after Dep) 6,000
Cr Revaluation 6,000Why ????????????
Next 3 Years increase in dep of 2,000Dr Revaluation $2,000
Cr Retained Earnings $2,000November 15, 2012 at 2:22 pm #107517Hi Lizzie, Of a truth, It can be confusing but i will take you through it.
The best way to understand it is to prepare two column, one for historic cost as though the asset is never revalued and one for revalued cost as belowPPE HCost Revaln Revaln Res
20×6 cost 10000 10000
20×8 acc depn (4000) (4000)
CV 6000 6000
Revaluation 12000 6000
Depn (2000) 12/3 (4000) (2000)Excess depn
Since the revaluation was credited to Rev Reserve, subsequent depn will not be charged completely to i/s since part of the gain on the increase is in reserve, so RR will be debited with 2k and credited to Retained Earning.Sorry, i couldnt get it to align but i hope u can make some sense out of it, otherwise let me know
November 18, 2012 at 5:59 pm #107518Thanks a million Temi , sorry im still a bit confused .
November 20, 2012 at 12:04 am #107519Hi, Sorry, i know you might not understand as the column went out of sync, i will try and explain,
The initial cost was 10k depreciated over 5 yrs uel, so at 20X8, 2 yrs depn must have been charged leaving the asset at the NBV of 6K ( 10-4(2yrs charges).
Assets then revalued to 12K giving rise to 6k of revaluation increase. i.e 12- 6(nbv) which is then taken to reserve. Hence the answer you have Dr Asset 6k(i.e increase the asset to 12K) and cr Reserve 6K ( revaluation).
After the revaluation, the asset will still need to be depreciated over the remaining 3 yrs useful life on a straight line, hence the depn charge now becomes 4k per annum (12/3) as against 2k per annum( original depn charge before revaluation.
Since the revaluation amount of 6k has now been taken to reserve, so the excess charge over the usual depn of 2k will go against reserve that enjoys the benefit of the increase in asset value.
therefore only 2k of the new depn charge goes against income statement with the excess going agaist reserve. hence the answer Dr Reserve, Credit R/E.
with 2k excess of the depn charges.
I hope u understand, feel free to contact me if still confusedNovember 20, 2012 at 12:53 pm #107520Thanks a million , much appreciated .
Was the revaluation that was confusing me …Thanks againNovember 28, 2012 at 7:45 am #107521AnonymousInactive- Topics: 0
- Replies: 3
- ☆
Hi Temi,
Thank you for your clear explaination, but I don’t really get the entry:
Dr Reserve – 2k
Cr RE – 2k
I thought the depreciation of 4k would be accounted as follows:
Dr RE – 2k
Dr Reserve – 2k
Cr Accumulation depreciation 4kNovember 29, 2012 at 1:01 pm #107522After 2 years CV of asset is 8k (cost 12 less depn 2×2) which is revalued to 12k. So we have revaluation gain of 6k. Now as we usually do we charge same depn of 2k to IS and reducing revaluation reserve by excess depn of 2k (6k/ remaining 3 years).
Entry:
DR RE 2k
DR Reserve 2k
CR Asset 4kDecember 3, 2012 at 5:20 pm #107523AnonymousInactive- Topics: 0
- Replies: 11
- ☆
@vivian1642006 said:
Hi Temi,
Thank you for your clear explaination, but I don’t really get the entry:
Dr Reserve – 2k
Cr RE – 2kThe reason for this adjustment maybe for the reversal entry of the excess depreciation that have been charged to the Profit or Loss. For doing the console financial statement, the simple adjustment that we will make is juz reversal the wrong accounting transaction instead of eliminate the previous double entry and do it correct way.
- AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.