Forums › Ask ACCA Tutor Forums › Ask the Tutor ACCA FR Exams › Replacement of assets
- This topic has 23 replies, 3 voices, and was last updated 8 years ago by MikeLittle.
- AuthorPosts
- April 6, 2016 at 10:11 am #309150
if I have an asset and the book value is $4,000.00 and it was exchanged for a new one worth $7,500.00 free of cost. How should I account for this in my books?
April 6, 2016 at 10:22 am #309153Open a Disposal account and debit that account with $4,000 (Credit the Asset account with $4,000)
Debit the Asset account with $7,500 and Credit Disposal account with $7,500
Balance off the Disposal account and take the profit on disposal to the Statement of Profit or Loss
Depreciate the new asset of $7,500 according to the entity’s depreciation policy
And finally, maybe revise F3 by following John’s lectures
Clear?
April 12, 2016 at 1:54 pm #309878AnonymousInactive- Topics: 43
- Replies: 124
- ☆☆
Do we eliminate the accumulated depreciation regarding this item of asset? Thank you.
April 12, 2016 at 4:09 pm #309904You already have done so, automatically! When you transferred the “book value is $4,000.00” you were in effect transferring the $XXXX cost and the $xxxx accumulated depreciation.
OK?
April 12, 2016 at 4:20 pm #309908AnonymousInactive- Topics: 43
- Replies: 124
- ☆☆
Sorry, still don’t understand.
April 12, 2016 at 4:24 pm #309910OK, pretend that this asset that you are part-exchanging – remember, it has a book value of $4,000 – originally cost $15,000 but has been depreciated by $11,000 up to the date of its disposal.
Now, when we transfer the carrying value / book value to the disposal account, isn’t that in effect transferring $15,000 cost from the asset account and $11,000 from the accumulated depreciation account?
Now do you see?
April 13, 2016 at 1:16 am #309945AnonymousInactive- Topics: 43
- Replies: 124
- ☆☆
So you mean we do not remove the accumulated depreciation and we continue to transfer the new asset’s depreciation to the accumulated depreciation account?
Thank you.
April 13, 2016 at 7:36 am #309972In the question that you have asked, there is no way that we can “remove the depreciation” because you haven’t told me the original cost and the accumulated depreciation up to the date of the trade in!
Give me that information and I’ll adjust my answer accordingly but, from the information you have given, everything that I have told you so far has been correct!
April 13, 2016 at 12:38 pm #310004AnonymousInactive- Topics: 43
- Replies: 124
- ☆☆
But I mean by principle, do we remove the accumulated depreciation? Thank you.
April 13, 2016 at 3:28 pm #310012“by principle, do we remove the accumulated depreciation” – by principle, we HAVE!
When we took the book value to the disposal account we were in effect taking the cost and separately the accumulated depreciation to the disposal account
So, yes, in principle, we DO take the accumulated depreciation to the disposal account
OK?
April 13, 2016 at 5:25 pm #310037AnonymousInactive- Topics: 43
- Replies: 124
- ☆☆
Sorry, I am lost now. Let’s assume on the scenario that the asset’s current book value is 4000, with the cost price of 8000, so the accumulated depreciation is 4000. Now the replacement asset is 7500 free of cost.
Could you show the journal entries for your explanation above?
Thank you.
April 13, 2016 at 5:51 pm #310040First of all – what’s free of cost? I’ll assume that this is the cash-price with no trade-in involved
Second, I’m going to change your figures because there are too many $4,000 flying around. So the example I shall use will use the figures from my earlier post. The asset that we shall trade-in against the replacement asset originally cost $15,000 and has been depreciated by $11,000 – therefore has a book value of $4,000
The replacement asset has a cash price of $10,000 but the supplier will allow us a trade-in allowance of $3,500
Open a Disposal Account
Dr Disposal Account $15,000
Cr Asset Account $15,000Dr Accumulated Depreciation Account $11,000
Cr Disposal Account $11,000Dr Asset Account $3,500
Cr Disposal Account $3,500Balance off the disposal Account and take the balancing figure (a loss of $500) to Statement of Profit or Loss
We now have a balance of $3,500 debit in the the Asset Account and must account for the remaining outstanding figure of $6,500
Dr Asset Account $6,500
Cr Cash (or Creditor) $6,500And there you have it
Is that any clearer?
April 14, 2016 at 4:03 am #310055AnonymousInactive- Topics: 43
- Replies: 124
- ☆☆
Yes, now I get it. If the trade-in as stated by OP is 4000 book value (with 5000 accumulated depreciation) for a new one worth 7500. The journals will be open an disposal account, and:
Dr Disposal account $4000
Cr Asset account $4000Dr Accumulated depreciation account $5000
Cr Disposal account $5000Dr Asset account $7500
Cr Disposal account $7500The disposal account’s balancing figure will be $8500 on the debit side, and will be taken that to the credit side of the income statement.
And the Asset account now is having $7500 on the debit side?
Thank you.
April 14, 2016 at 7:37 am #310067Your question is not clear! We need 4 values for a question like this – unless you’re going to combine two of them into “book value”
We need:
1 Original cost
2 Accumulated depreciation
3 Trade-in value
4 Cost price of new machineNow, you may combine those first two and just have a single figure for book value
But we still need to know how much the new machine seller is going to allow us as a trade-in against the original machine
Imagine that you wish to exchange your car.
It originally cost you $6,000 3 years ago and now has a book value of $2,300
You go along to the car showrooms and see a new one that you would really like. The price of the new one is $9,950 so you ask the dealer how much he will give you as a trade-in allowance on your existing car and the dealer says $2,500
Now, give me the journal entries!
April 14, 2016 at 10:07 am #310090AnonymousInactive- Topics: 43
- Replies: 124
- ☆☆
Yes, I understand. I am simply following OP’s scenario that the trade-in of new asset worth $7500 is free of charge.
April 14, 2016 at 12:16 pm #310102“the trade-in of new asset worth $7500 is free of charge.” – I’ve said this before …. I have no idea what you mean by this!
(Who is “OP”? Do you mean OpenTuition?”
April 14, 2016 at 1:28 pm #310109AnonymousInactive- Topics: 43
- Replies: 124
- ☆☆
Sorry, OP means the Original Poster. He/she posted below:
“if I have an asset and the book value is $4,000.00 and it was exchanged for a new one worth $7,500.00 free of cost. How should I account for this in my books?”And I was following on his//her thought.
April 14, 2016 at 3:54 pm #310129Oh, OK, but I still have no idea what “exchanged for a new one worth $7,500.00 free of cost.” means!
April 14, 2016 at 4:02 pm #310132AnonymousInactive- Topics: 43
- Replies: 124
- ☆☆
I think maybe OP means one is offerred to have the $7500 asset in exchange of the $4000, free of charge. At least that’s what I thought and based on which I asked the following question if the entries will be like:
Dr Asset $7500
Cr Disposal $7500Dr accumulated depreciation $5000 (say)
Cr disposal $5000Dr disposal $9000
Cr asset $9000 (say, at cost of the original asset)Then taking the balancing figure of $3500 to the income statement.
Thank you.
April 14, 2016 at 4:28 pm #310134Ah! Now I understand.
What an unlikely situation! Why would the owner of a new asset worth $7,500 let you have it in exchange for an old asset with a book value of $4,000
Yes, it COULD happen. If the new asset owner particularly wants your $4,000 asset.
Or if the $4,000 asset is (in the mind of the new asset owner) grossly under-valued
Or if your old asset fits strategically into the new asset owner’s plans for the future
But, come on! How often is that going to happen?
April 14, 2016 at 6:18 pm #310140AnonymousInactive- Topics: 43
- Replies: 124
- ☆☆
Yes, it’s rarely. Thank you. Now I have learned double entries about two two possibilities.
April 15, 2016 at 6:45 am #310174That’s good …. but you should have known those from your F3 studies
I know, you were exempt F3. Why? Because you (ill-advisedly) claimed the exemption based on some theoretical seminar at university that taught you nothing about the building blocks of accountancy – ie debits and credits
If you know of anyone that is thinking of claiming an F3 exemption, talk them out of it! It’s no cheaper to be exempt than it is to take the exam and you will be correspondingly stronger when it comes to F7 and P2
April 15, 2016 at 9:35 am #310193AnonymousInactive- Topics: 43
- Replies: 124
- ☆☆
Huh, actually I didn’t get exempted any papers, though granted I passed F3 with very low mark, only 56…
April 15, 2016 at 12:21 pm #310209Well maybe you need to have another look at John’s F3 lectures and course notes – maybe you will understand them more thoroughly now that you’re into the higher level F papers
- AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.