• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free Notes, Lectures, Tests and Forums for ACCA and CIMA exams

  • ACCA
  • CIMA
  • FIA
  • OBU
  • Books
  • Forums
  • Ask AI
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login
  • ACCA Forums
  • Ask ACCA Tutor
  • CIMA Forums
  • Ask CIMA Tutor
  • FIA
  • OBU
  • Buy/Sell Books
  • All Forums
  • Latest Topics

June 2025 ACCA Exam Results

Comments & Instant poll >>

20% off ACCA & CIMA Books

OpenTuition recommends the new interactive BPP books for June 2025 exams.
Get your discount code >>

RELEVANT COSTING MODIFIED

Forums › Ask ACCA Tutor Forums › Ask the Tutor ACCA PM Exams › RELEVANT COSTING MODIFIED

  • This topic has 1 reply, 2 voices, and was last updated 5 years ago by John Moffat.
Viewing 2 posts - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • November 3, 2019 at 12:50 pm #551493
    fathihahfa
    Member
    • Topics: 4
    • Replies: 0
    • ☆

    sir, could you please help me with this question.
    UU Company has been asked to quote for a special contract. The following information about the material needed has been given:Material X: Book valueScrap valueReplacement cost$5.00 per kg$0.50 per kg$5.50 per kgThe contract requires 10 kgs of Material X. There are 250 kgs of this material in inventory which was purchased in error over two years ago. If Material X is modified, at a cost of $2 per kg, it could then be used as a substitute for material Y which is in regular use and currently costs $6 per kg.What is the relevant cost of the materials for the special contract?

    November 4, 2019 at 9:24 am #551526
    John Moffat
    Keymaster
    • Topics: 57
    • Replies: 54704
    • ☆☆☆☆☆

    It is a bit difficult to follow the typing, but I am assuming that the scrap value of material X is $0.50.
    If there was no mention of Material Y then if they did not do the contract then they would scrap it for $0.50 per kg.
    Alternatively, they could not scrap it (and therefore lose $0.50 per kg) and spend another $2 per kg and use it instead of material Y which would save them $6 per kg

    Using it instead of material Y would be better because the net saving would be 6 – 2 – 0.50 = $3.50 per kg.

  • Author
    Posts
Viewing 2 posts - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
Log In

Primary Sidebar

Donate
If you have benefited from our materials, please donate

ACCA News:

ACCA My Exam Performance for non-variant

Applied Skills exams is available NOW

ACCA Options:  “Read the Mind of the Marker” articles

Subscribe to ACCA’s Student Accountant Direct

ACCA CBE 2025 Exams

How was your exam, and what was the exam result?

BT CBE exam was.. | MA CBE exam was..
FA CBE exam was.. | LW CBE exam was..

Donate

If you have benefited from OpenTuition please donate.

PQ Magazine

Latest Comments

  • AdityaSairam on Overcapitalisation and Overtrading – ACCA Financial Management (FM)
  • verweijlisa on Financial performance – Example 2 – ACCA Financial Reporting (FR)
  • John Moffat on Linear Programming – Spare capacity and Shadow prices – ACCA Performance Management (PM)
  • John Moffat on The Statement of Financial Position and Income Statement (part d)
  • Salexy on Linear Programming – Spare capacity and Shadow prices – ACCA Performance Management (PM)

Copyright © 2025 · Support · Contact · Advertising · OpenLicense · About · Sitemap · Comments · Log in