• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free Notes, Lectures, Tests and Forums for ACCA and CIMA exams

  • ACCA
  • CIMA
  • FIA
  • OBU
  • Books
  • Forums
  • Ask AI
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login
  • ACCA Forums
  • Ask ACCA Tutor
  • FIA Forums
  • CIMA Forums
  • OBU Forums
  • Qualified Members forum
  • Buy/Sell Books
  • All Forums
  • Latest Topics

March 2026 ACCA Exams

Comments & Instant poll

20% off ACCA & CIMA Books

OpenTuition recommends the new interactive BPP books for June 2026 exams.
Get your discount code >>

Relevant Costing – Accept or Reject decisions

Forums › CIMA Forums › Relevant Costing – Accept or Reject decisions

  • This topic has 7 replies, 4 voices, and was last updated 7 years ago by Cath.
Viewing 8 posts - 1 through 8 (of 8 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • December 2, 2017 at 11:55 pm #419824
    amithrad
    Participant
    • Topics: 1
    • Replies: 1
    • ☆

    I came across the following question. Please help.

    A single product firm working at full capacity has following data;
    Production & sales for the year – 20000 units
    Machine capacity available and fully utilised – 40000 hrs
    Per units data;
    VC $8.20
    FC $1.30
    Selling price $12.50

    An order for 3000 modified units which requires 6600 of machine hrs was received with a additional material cost of $1 per unit.

    The decision to accept or reject should be taken at the price;
    A. $41,790
    B. $40,500
    C. $27,600
    D. $17,190

    The answer according to my calculations is $44,250. Following are my workings;
    VC per machine hr – (8.2×20000)/40000= $4.10
    Contribution per machine hr – {(12.5-8.2)x20000}/40000= $2.15
    Addition material cost per unit = $1

    Therefore the relevant cost is;
    VC – $4.10×6600 = $27,060
    Contribution foregone – $2.15×6600 = $14,190
    Additional Material – 1×30000 = $3,000
    Total relevant cost (min price) = $44,250

    Please clarify. Thank you.

    December 7, 2017 at 11:47 pm #421763
    Cath
    Participant
    • Topics: 0
    • Replies: 448
    • ☆☆☆

    I have to say – I do agree with your workings and logic. Possibly the question has a bit missing in it – or there is a mistake in the possible options?

    This happens from time-to-time – don’t let it put you off – your understanding of the topic is ok in my opinion.

    December 12, 2017 at 11:51 pm #422803
    amithrad
    Participant
    • Topics: 1
    • Replies: 1
    • ☆

    Thank you so very much.

    December 18, 2017 at 12:38 pm #423915
    Cath
    Participant
    • Topics: 0
    • Replies: 448
    • ☆☆☆

    You’re welcome

    January 24, 2018 at 5:11 am #432556
    tfbanker
    Member
    • Topics: 1
    • Replies: 5
    • ☆

    In a real exam I would come to an aswer this way.
    1) Contribution forgone: 6 600 hours / 2 hours per unit = 3 300 units could be produced in normal course of business. 3 300 * ($12.5 – $8.2) = $ 14 190.
    2) Additional material: 3 000 * $1 = $3 000.
    3) VC: 3 000 * $8.2 = $ 24 600 (steps 2 and 3 can be combined: 3 000 * $9.2 = $ 27 600).

    So I would choose option A – $41 790 ($14 190 + $27 600 = $41 790).

    Regards,
    YRB

    January 27, 2018 at 12:50 am #433310
    Cath
    Participant
    • Topics: 0
    • Replies: 448
    • ☆☆☆

    Hi yes apologies. I’ve seen quite a few errors in questions recently -I assumed too quickly that this was one!
    The only small error that amithrad has made in his workings is to apply the variable cost on an hourly basis rather than a per unit basis.
    Variable cost of making the special order items would be 8.20 x 3000 units =$24600 then adding on the $1 for modifying each unit makes 1 x3000=$3000)
    The lost contribution is worked out in hours and was correct as stated 6600 x 2.15 = 14190…
    All together these figures come to $41790
    Answer A.

    May 19, 2018 at 11:03 pm #452895
    kauseni42
    Member
    • Topics: 0
    • Replies: 1
    • ☆

    why is profit not considered as a relevant cost

    May 20, 2018 at 4:39 pm #453001
    Cath
    Participant
    • Topics: 0
    • Replies: 448
    • ☆☆☆

    Im not quite sure what you mean?

    The contribution forgone is included?

    The question is basically asking for the minimum contract price – which will be the sum of all relevant costs incurred by the contract.

  • Author
    Posts
Viewing 8 posts - 1 through 8 (of 8 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
Log In

Primary Sidebar

Kaplan ACCA Free Trial

Donate
If you have benefited from our materials, please donate

ACCA News:

ACCA My Exam Performance for non-variant

Applied Skills exams is available NOW

ACCA Options:  “Read the Mind of the Marker” articles

Subscribe to ACCA’s Student Accountant Direct

ACCA CBE Exams – Instant Poll

How was your exam, and what was the exam result?

BT CBE exam was.. | MA CBE exam was..
FA CBE exam was.. | LW CBE exam was..

Donate

If you have benefited from OpenTuition please donate.

PQ Magazine

Latest Comments

  • Arnold89 on Introduction to Financial Accounting – ACCA Financial Accounting (FA) lectures
  • deepikasingh on ACCA BT Chapter 17 – The nature of communication – Questions
  • deepikasingh on ACCA BT Chapter 14 – How people learn – Questions
  • zurapirveli@gmail.com on Equity settled share based payments – goods – ACCA (SBR) lectures
  • Sid24012003 on Intangibles – Example 2 – ACCA Financial Reporting (FR)

Copyright © 2026 · Support · Contact · Advertising · OpenLicense · About · Sitemap · Comments · Log in