• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free Notes, Lectures, Tests and Forums for ACCA and CIMA exams

  • ACCA
  • CIMA
  • FIA
  • OBU
  • Books
  • Forums
  • Ask AI
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login
  • ACCA Forums
  • Ask ACCA Tutor
  • CIMA Forums
  • Ask CIMA Tutor
  • FIA
  • OBU
  • Buy/Sell Books
  • All Forums
  • Latest Topics

20% off ACCA & CIMA Books

OpenTuition recommends the new interactive BPP books for September 2025 exams.
Get your discount code >>

relevant costing

Forums › Ask ACCA Tutor Forums › Ask the Tutor ACCA PM Exams › relevant costing

  • This topic has 5 replies, 3 voices, and was last updated 7 years ago by John Moffat.
Viewing 6 posts - 1 through 6 (of 6 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • July 23, 2017 at 1:38 pm #398228
    adarsh1997
    Participant
    • Topics: 646
    • Replies: 282
    • ☆☆☆☆

    P is considering whether to continue making a component or to buy it from an outside
    supplier. It uses 12,000 of the components each year.
    The internal manufacturing cost comprises:
    $/unit
    Direct materials 3.00
    Direct labour 4.00
    Variable overhead 1.00
    Specific fixed cost 2.50
    Other fixed costs 2.00
    If the direct labour were not used to manufacture the component, it would be used to
    increase the production of another item for which there is unlimited demand. This other
    item has a contribution of $10.00 per unit but requires $8.00 of labour per unit.

    What is the maximum price per component, at which buying is preferable to internal
    manufacture?

    – The answer is $15.50
    -In the book it says “Relevant cost = Contribution Forgone + Direct labour = $10/2 + $4 = $9”
    -Could you explain the logic of this calculation of relevant cost?

    Thanks.

    July 24, 2017 at 8:38 am #398309
    John Moffat
    Keymaster
    • Topics: 57
    • Replies: 54701
    • ☆☆☆☆☆

    Every unit of the component costs $4 in labour.

    If instead the produced the other item, the labour cost would be $8, and so the other item must take twice as long to produce.

    So for every 2 units of the component they could instead make 1 unit of the other item. This 1 unit would have given contribution of $10, so the lost contribution for every 1 unit of the component is $10/2. We then add this to the labour cost of the component of $4 for the same reasons as I have explained to you before.

    August 1, 2017 at 2:24 pm #399842
    aisha4897
    Member
    • Topics: 0
    • Replies: 2
    • ☆

    Apologies sir but I still don’t understand why we are dividing 10 by 2 🙁

    August 1, 2017 at 3:55 pm #399862
    John Moffat
    Keymaster
    • Topics: 57
    • Replies: 54701
    • ☆☆☆☆☆

    Producing the other item for which there is unlimited demand would give a contribution of $10 but would take two times as much labour as the component in question.

    Therefore for every 2 units of the component in question that we were to make would lose $10 we could have made from other other item for which there is unlimited demand.

    If 2 units loses $10, then 1 unit loses 10/2 = $5

    August 4, 2017 at 3:23 pm #400402
    aisha4897
    Member
    • Topics: 0
    • Replies: 2
    • ☆

    Thank you so much sir, I now understand it Alhumdulillah!! How did the answer come to be $15.5?? Is it by adding $3 of direct material, $1 of variable O/H and $2.5 of specific fixed cost to the $9 that you had found earlier??

    Sorry but I haven’t come across a question like this in my BPP kit so it’s confusing as there’s relevant costing+make or buy decision in it. In my BPP textbook on page 170, it’s written that the relevant costs are the differeriant costs between making and buying, so to my understanding, if the unit variable cost of making is 14 and the unit variable cost of buying is 12 then the relevant cost is 2 in this case??

    August 4, 2017 at 5:47 pm #400430
    John Moffat
    Keymaster
    • Topics: 57
    • Replies: 54701
    • ☆☆☆☆☆

    But here, if they make the component themselves then they lose production that there could have been of another product, which loses them the contribution from the other product of $10.

    I do suggest that you watch my free lectures on relevant costing 🙂

  • Author
    Posts
Viewing 6 posts - 1 through 6 (of 6 total)
  • The topic ‘relevant costing’ is closed to new replies.

Primary Sidebar

Donate
If you have benefited from our materials, please donate

ACCA News:

ACCA My Exam Performance for non-variant

Applied Skills exams is available NOW

ACCA Options:  “Read the Mind of the Marker” articles

Subscribe to ACCA’s Student Accountant Direct

ACCA CBE 2025 Exams

How was your exam, and what was the exam result?

BT CBE exam was.. | MA CBE exam was..
FA CBE exam was.. | LW CBE exam was..

Donate

If you have benefited from OpenTuition please donate.

PQ Magazine

Latest Comments

  • RashidMh on MA Chapter 1 Questions Accounting for Management
  • John Moffat on Relevant Cash Flows for DCF Relevant Costs (example 1) – ACCA Financial Management (FM)
  • John Moffat on Accounting for Management – ACCA Management Accounting (MA)
  • Hsaini on Accounting for Management – ACCA Management Accounting (MA)
  • kennedyavege@2023 on Relevant Cash Flows for DCF Relevant Costs (example 1) – ACCA Financial Management (FM)

Copyright © 2025 · Support · Contact · Advertising · OpenLicense · About · Sitemap · Comments · Log in