• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free Notes, Lectures, Tests and Forums for ACCA and CIMA exams

  • ACCA
  • CIMA
  • FIA
  • OBU
  • Books
  • Forums
  • Ask AI
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login
  • ACCA Forums
  • Ask ACCA Tutor
  • CIMA Forums
  • Ask CIMA Tutor
  • FIA
  • OBU
  • Buy/Sell Books
  • All Forums
  • Latest Topics

20% off ACCA & CIMA Books

OpenTuition recommends the new interactive BPP books for September 2025 exams.
Get your discount code >>

Related Party disclosure

Forums › Ask ACCA Tutor Forums › Ask the Tutor ACCA AAA Exams › Related Party disclosure

  • This topic has 1 reply, 2 voices, and was last updated 8 years ago by MikeLittle.
Viewing 2 posts - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • May 31, 2017 at 4:43 pm #389264
    abbas7796
    Member
    • Topics: 135
    • Replies: 256
    • ☆☆☆

    Hello Mike

    whenever we have related party transactions then the standard requires us to disclose the transaction plus the nature of the relationship and any other contractual terms. however what happens if the transaction is not at arms length?

    i understand that the audit procedures in that case should be to investigate the authorisation of such transactions and whether or not it has been disclosed properly in financial statement notes.

    however does it matter if the transaction is not at arms length? i mean will this have no implications for the audit report if the management in this case discloses everything in the notes?

    May 31, 2017 at 6:21 pm #389304
    MikeLittle
    Keymaster
    • Topics: 27
    • Replies: 23329
    • ☆☆☆☆☆

    “however what happens if the transaction is not at arms length?”

    All the more reason for disclosing the full details!

    If it’s all fully and transparently disclosed, then no implication for the opinion unless it’s worthy of an emphasis of matter paragraph

    Alternatively it could have been a KAM in which case no Emphasis of Matter

    Hope that helps

  • Author
    Posts
Viewing 2 posts - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)
  • The topic ‘Related Party disclosure’ is closed to new replies.

Primary Sidebar

Donate
If you have benefited from our materials, please donate

ACCA News:

ACCA My Exam Performance for non-variant

Applied Skills exams is available NOW

ACCA Options:  “Read the Mind of the Marker” articles

Subscribe to ACCA’s Student Accountant Direct

ACCA CBE 2025 Exams

How was your exam, and what was the exam result?

BT CBE exam was.. | MA CBE exam was..
FA CBE exam was.. | LW CBE exam was..

Donate

If you have benefited from OpenTuition please donate.

PQ Magazine

Latest Comments

  • John Moffat on Group Accounts The Consolidated Income Statement (part b) – ACCA Financial Accounting (FA) lectures
  • John Moffat on Activity Based Costing part 2 – ACCA Performance Management (PM)
  • FarhadKamalzada on Group Accounts The Consolidated Income Statement (part b) – ACCA Financial Accounting (FA) lectures
  • MikeLittle on LW Global Chapter 17 Questions Company Law: Illegalities
  • eliaskaz123 on Activity Based Costing part 2 – ACCA Performance Management (PM)

Copyright © 2025 · Support · Contact · Advertising · OpenLicense · About · Sitemap · Comments · Log in