- This topic has 3 replies, 2 voices, and was last updated 6 years ago by
.
- Posts
Hi
If for a deficiency that Supplier statement reconciliations are
no longer performed, examiner has mentioned control that Supplier statement reconciliations should be performed on a monthly basis
and these should be reviewed by a responsible official.But doesn’t it seems to be incomplete? I mean should he not add 1 more line in this that “also he should evidence his review by signing reconciliations”?
Published answers are not “boiler plate”. The examiner clearly considers the answer as published to be sufficient for one mark. Published answers do not incorporate every possible word/answer point that might be worthy of credit.
So there is no need to write this line “also he should evidence his review by signing reconciliations”? Even if suppose I write it so then will there any marks be deducted for this line?
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.