• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free Notes, Lectures, Tests and Forums for ACCA and CIMA exams

  • ACCA
  • CIMA
  • FIA
  • OBU
  • Books
  • Forums
  • Ask AI
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login
  • ACCA Forums
  • Ask ACCA Tutor
  • CIMA Forums
  • Ask CIMA Tutor
  • FIA
  • OBU
  • Buy/Sell Books
  • All Forums
  • Latest Topics

June 2025 ACCA Exams

How was your exam? Comments & Instant poll >>

20% off ACCA & CIMA Books

OpenTuition recommends the new interactive BPP books for June 2025 exams.
Get your discount code >>

Real Options – Option to redeploy

Forums › Ask ACCA Tutor Forums › Ask the Tutor ACCA AFM Exams › Real Options – Option to redeploy

  • This topic has 9 replies, 2 voices, and was last updated 8 years ago by John Moffat.
Viewing 10 posts - 1 through 10 (of 10 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • February 3, 2017 at 12:32 am #370848
    Abdul Rafay
    Member
    • Topics: 29
    • Replies: 44
    • ☆☆

    Sir, option to redeploy is a real put option.

    We know that a put option is only exercised when the value of the underlying asset is lower than the exercise price.

    In the case of a real option:

    Value of project (value of underlying asset) = PV of cash flows from the new activity (the activity in which funds would be redeployed)

    Exercise price = Switching costs

    Then why in the bpp book it says the switch from one activity to another will occur if the PV of cash flows from the new activity will exceed the switching costs. [This is the opposite of the main put option theory or this is exactly the call option theory]
    Am I missing something here or one of my assumptions regarding values for the project is wrong.

    February 3, 2017 at 8:47 am #370880
    John Moffat
    Keymaster
    • Topics: 57
    • Replies: 54676
    • ☆☆☆☆☆

    Although it is a put option (because you are effectively abandoning the existing activity and moving to a new one), think about the logic of it.

    Why on earth would you consider switching to a new activity unless the PV of the benefits was more than the cost of switching? It would be stupid to switch if that were not the case 🙂

    February 3, 2017 at 3:00 pm #370920
    Abdul Rafay
    Member
    • Topics: 29
    • Replies: 44
    • ☆☆

    Sir, I definitely agree with your latter statement.

    Your first one is logical too, but I’m talking about the math of it. If [Value of underlying asset>Excercise price] we exercise Call Options, but Put Options are the opposite. So this makes Option to redeploy a call option.

    Ok lets look at this from a different point of view.

    If we have an option to redeploy with the PV of the new activity, the costs of switching and all the other variables needed given in the question.
    What would be the Pa and the Pe for the Black-Scholes formula??

    February 3, 2017 at 3:28 pm #370931
    John Moffat
    Keymaster
    • Topics: 57
    • Replies: 54676
    • ☆☆☆☆☆

    You would do the maths as though it was in fact a call option.

    If you are referring to a question in the BPP Revision Kit (or to a past exam question) then say which one.
    If it is a question in the Study Text then I can’t help you because I don’t have the BPP Study Text.

    February 4, 2017 at 1:05 pm #371031
    Abdul Rafay
    Member
    • Topics: 29
    • Replies: 44
    • ☆☆

    I don’t think option to redeploy has been examined in the past, the BPP gives a reference to the year in which any topic was examined but it didn’t with this so…

    Has it been examined?

    February 4, 2017 at 6:04 pm #371060
    John Moffat
    Keymaster
    • Topics: 57
    • Replies: 54676
    • ☆☆☆☆☆

    Not that I remember (and if it is examined it is more likely to be just a description rather than a calculation).

    February 4, 2017 at 7:28 pm #371069
    Abdul Rafay
    Member
    • Topics: 29
    • Replies: 44
    • ☆☆

    Ok but if it is a calculation, am I right to assume, for the Black-Scholes formula, Pa as PV of cash flows of new activity and Pe as cost of switching?

    February 5, 2017 at 8:56 am #371111
    John Moffat
    Keymaster
    • Topics: 57
    • Replies: 54676
    • ☆☆☆☆☆

    Correct 🙂

    February 5, 2017 at 12:52 pm #371161
    Abdul Rafay
    Member
    • Topics: 29
    • Replies: 44
    • ☆☆

    Ok Thanks!

    February 5, 2017 at 4:44 pm #371202
    John Moffat
    Keymaster
    • Topics: 57
    • Replies: 54676
    • ☆☆☆☆☆

    You are welcome 🙂

  • Author
    Posts
Viewing 10 posts - 1 through 10 (of 10 total)
  • The topic ‘Real Options – Option to redeploy’ is closed to new replies.

Primary Sidebar

Donate
If you have benefited from our materials, please donate

ACCA News:

ACCA My Exam Performance for non-variant

Applied Skills exams is available NOW

ACCA Options:  “Read the Mind of the Marker” articles

Subscribe to ACCA’s Student Accountant Direct

ACCA CBE 2025 Exams

How was your exam, and what was the exam result?

BT CBE exam was.. | MA CBE exam was..
FA CBE exam was.. | LW CBE exam was..

Donate

If you have benefited from OpenTuition please donate.

PQ Magazine

Latest Comments

  • mm3677 on IAS 16 Accounting for a revaluation – CIMA F1 Financial Reporting
  • Anastesia123 on MA Chapter 1 Questions Accounting for Management
  • John Moffat on MA Chapter 26 Questions Variance Analysis
  • acowtant on Changes in group structure – examples – ACCA SBR lectures
  • Samantha96 on The Statement of Financial Position and Income Statement (part a) – ACCA Financial Accounting (FA) lectures

Copyright © 2025 · Support · Contact · Advertising · OpenLicense · About · Sitemap · Comments · Log in