Forums › Ask ACCA Tutor Forums › Ask the Tutor ACCA AAA Exams › Question – Matters to be considered and audit evidence
- This topic has 3 replies, 2 voices, and was last updated 6 days ago by
Kim Smith.
- AuthorPosts
- February 12, 2026 at 11:49 pm #724696
For a question like this:
Comment on the matters to be considered and explain the audit evidence you would expect to find during your review of the audit working papers in relation to the issues identified.
Does our audit evidence have to 100% be linked to the matters to be considered ?
Context – OSIER CO
Cost of inventory
Inventory costs include all purchase costs and the costs of conversion of raw materials into finished goods. Conversion costs include direct labour costs and an allocation of production overheads. Direct labour costs are calculated based on the average production time per unit of inventory, which is estimated by the production manager, multiplied by the estimated labour cost per hour, which is calculated using the forecast annual wages of production staff divided by the annual scheduled hours of production. Production overheads are all fixed and are allocated based on the forecast annual units of production. At the year end, inventory was valued at $21 million (20X4 ? $20 million).Comment on the matters to be considered and explain the audit evidence you would expect to find during your review of the audit working papers in relation to the issues identified.
i. Cost of inventoryMy answer –
Matters to be considered
Inventory is (21m/1,919m) 1.1% of total assets and (21m/107m) 19.6% of profit before taxes. Therefore, inventory is highly material to both the statement of financial position and profit and loss.
The calculation of inventory seems to be highly complex. The complexity increases the risk of error in the calculation, which increases the risk of mistatement.The calculation is also based on a number of estimates – average production time per unit, forecast annual wages of production, and annual scheuled hours of production. These increase the risk of both error and manipulation as it can have management bias.
Therefore, there is an increased risk that inventory can be mistated due to its subjective and complex nature of calculation.
Audit evidence
Evidence that the inventory figures have been recalculated by the audit team to confirm the arithmetical accuracy of management’s calculations.
Documentation of the results obtained when the audit firm disccused with management on the reasonabless and appropriateness of the method used to calculate inventory.
Documentation that inventory costs have been appropriately recorded accoriding to the relevant financial reporting standards.
Is my approach to the question wrong ?
Please let me know, thank you
February 13, 2026 at 2:07 pm #724701Short answer – there is no “matching” between “matters” and “audit evidence” – which is why answers to such questions are not tabulated/set out in a columnar format.
They are linked by virtue of the fact that they both relate to “the issues identified”.
IMAGINE you are an audit partner (or manager) and you have a current audit file on your desk to review after the fieldwork has been completed. The top working paper in the file when you open it is “points for partner (or manager)” – what “matters” do you need to consider as you read each point?
– A good place to start is – “is it material?” – presumably yes, otherwise why is the manager (or audit supervisor) wasting your time by drawing it to your attention?
– Is there misstatement? e.g. how has it been accounted for? v how should it have been accounted for? This is where you need to know your IFRSs
– Has sufficient appropriate audit evidence been obtained? (is there limitation in scope?) – it may indicate for example that “only” some limited audit procedures have been performed or that something has not been performed.
– If the manager/supervisor has drawn some conclusion – do you concur? etc etc (depending on the specific Q)
Now, having considered those matters – what evidence do you need to check is included in the working papers?
February 13, 2026 at 3:25 pm #724702Ohhhh omgg thank you sooo muchh !! That really helped ^-^
February 13, 2026 at 3:47 pm #724703You are most welcome!
- AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
