• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free Notes, Lectures, Tests and Forums for ACCA and CIMA exams

  • ACCA
  • CIMA
  • FIA
  • OBU
  • Books
  • Forums
  • Ask AI
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login
  • ACCA Forums
  • Ask ACCA Tutor
  • FIA Forums
  • CIMA Forums
  • OBU Forums
  • Qualified Members forum
  • Buy/Sell Books
  • All Forums
  • Latest Topics

March 2026 ACCA Exams

Comments & Instant poll

20% off ACCA & CIMA Books

OpenTuition recommends the new interactive BPP books for June 2026 exams.
Get your discount code >>

Question 55- Crash Bash LTD – calculation of tax liability

Forums › Ask ACCA Tutor Forums › Ask the Tutor ACCA TX-UK Exams › Question 55- Crash Bash LTD – calculation of tax liability

  • This topic has 4 replies, 3 voices, and was last updated 11 years ago by Tax Tutor.
Viewing 5 posts - 1 through 5 (of 5 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • October 25, 2014 at 6:25 pm #205955
    mini
    Member
    • Topics: 38
    • Replies: 27
    • ☆☆

    Crash Bash LTD commenced trading on 1 February 2013
    Crash Bash LTD prepared its first accounts for the nine-month period ended 31 October 2013

    TTP = 338,510
    FII = 40,000
    Augmented profit = 378,510

    Question: Calculate corporation tax liability for the nine-month period ended 31 October 2013?

    According to the solution, the upper and lower limits are adjusted as following:
    Upper limit 1,500,000 * 9/12 *1/2 = 562,500
    Lower limit 300,000 * 9/12 *1/2 = 112,500

    Could you please explain to me why the upper and lower limits are multiplied by ½?

    October 25, 2014 at 8:39 pm #205969
    haymd1
    Member
    • Topics: 9
    • Replies: 26
    • ☆

    Because there would must be an associate company so the limits will be reduced read the question again

    October 25, 2014 at 10:56 pm #205978
    mini
    Member
    • Topics: 38
    • Replies: 27
    • ☆☆

    Thank you so much for your explanation. It all makes sense now.

    October 26, 2014 at 7:30 am #205998
    haymd1
    Member
    • Topics: 9
    • Replies: 26
    • ☆

    You are most welcome 🙂

    October 26, 2014 at 9:48 am #206056
    Tax Tutor
    Member
    • Topics: 2
    • Replies: 3965
    • ☆☆☆☆☆

    Correct – there must indeed be an associated company and hence divide the limits by 2.

  • Author
    Posts
Viewing 5 posts - 1 through 5 (of 5 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
Log In

Primary Sidebar

Kaplan ACCA Free Trial

Donate
If you have benefited from our materials, please donate

ACCA News:

ACCA My Exam Performance for non-variant

Applied Skills exams is available NOW

ACCA Options:  “Read the Mind of the Marker” articles

Subscribe to ACCA’s Student Accountant Direct

ACCA CBE Exams – Instant Poll

How was your exam, and what was the exam result?

BT CBE exam was.. | MA CBE exam was..
FA CBE exam was.. | LW CBE exam was..

Donate

If you have benefited from OpenTuition please donate.

PQ Magazine

Latest Comments

  • Arnold89 on Introduction to Financial Accounting – ACCA Financial Accounting (FA) lectures
  • deepikasingh on ACCA BT Chapter 17 – The nature of communication – Questions
  • deepikasingh on ACCA BT Chapter 14 – How people learn – Questions
  • zurapirveli@gmail.com on Equity settled share based payments – goods – ACCA (SBR) lectures
  • Sid24012003 on Intangibles – Example 2 – ACCA Financial Reporting (FR)

Copyright © 2026 · Support · Contact · Advertising · OpenLicense · About · Sitemap · Comments · Log in