• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free Notes, Lectures, Tests and Forums for ACCA and CIMA exams

  • ACCA
  • CIMA
  • FIA
  • OBU
  • Books
  • Forums
  • Ask AI
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login
  • ACCA Forums
  • Ask ACCA Tutor
  • CIMA Forums
  • Ask CIMA Tutor
  • FIA
  • OBU
  • Buy/Sell Books
  • All Forums
  • Latest Topics

June 2025 ACCA Exams

How was your exam? Comments & Instant poll >>

20% off ACCA & CIMA Books

OpenTuition recommends the new interactive BPP books for September 2025 exams.
Get your discount code >>

question

Forums › Ask ACCA Tutor Forums › Ask the Tutor ACCA PM Exams › question

  • This topic has 1 reply, 2 voices, and was last updated 3 years ago by John Moffat.
Viewing 2 posts - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • June 27, 2021 at 12:18 pm #626451
    xyzc
    Participant
    • Topics: 413
    • Replies: 175
    • ☆☆☆☆

    In a linear programming problem to determine the contribution-maximising production and sales volumes for two products, x and y, the following information is available.
    Product x per unit Product y per unit Total available per period
    Directs labour hours 2 hours 4 hours 10000hours
    Material x 4kg 2kg 14000kg
    Contribution per unit 12 18
    The profit-maximising level of output and sales is 3000 units of product x and 1000 units of product y.
    What is the shadow price of a direct labour hour?
    Can the direct labour hours equation and x =3000 units equation be used to solve this problem. If not why not
    Also why can not the direct labour hours equation and y= 1000 units equation be used to solve this problem.
    Also can the direct labour hours equation and the total contribution equation be used to solve this problem instead of using the material constraint equation.
    Why only material constraint equation has to be used to solve this problem
    When I used x = 3000 units equation and the direct labour hours equation I got a shadow price of 4.5.
    When I used y = 1000 units equation and the direct labour hours equation I got a shadow price of 6
    When I used the total contribution equation and the direct labour hours equation I got a shadow price of zero. Why is it zero?
    Also is the shadow price of 4.5 or 6 or 0 correct

    June 27, 2021 at 1:58 pm #626459
    John Moffat
    Keymaster
    • Topics: 57
    • Replies: 54684
    • ☆☆☆☆☆

    There is no point in continuing to ask me questions like this if you are not prepared to watch my lectures. You are wasting my time and you are wasting your own time, since you clearly do not understand linear programming.

    How on earth can x remain at 3,000 or y remain at 1,000 if there is one extra hour of labour? That would make no sense at all.

  • Author
    Posts
Viewing 2 posts - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)
  • The topic ‘question’ is closed to new replies.

Primary Sidebar

Donate
If you have benefited from our materials, please donate

ACCA News:

ACCA My Exam Performance for non-variant

Applied Skills exams is available NOW

ACCA Options:  “Read the Mind of the Marker” articles

Subscribe to ACCA’s Student Accountant Direct

ACCA CBE 2025 Exams

How was your exam, and what was the exam result?

BT CBE exam was.. | MA CBE exam was..
FA CBE exam was.. | LW CBE exam was..

Donate

If you have benefited from OpenTuition please donate.

PQ Magazine

Latest Comments

  • John Moffat on Activity Based Costing part 1 – ACCA Performance Management (PM)
  • Shabi on Activity Based Costing part 1 – ACCA Performance Management (PM)
  • Ark1 on Variance Analysis (part 4) – ACCA Management Accounting (MA)
  • EricObi on IAS 37 – Best estimate – ACCA Financial Reporting (FR)
  • Ken Garrett on The nature and structure of organisations – ACCA Paper BT

Copyright © 2025 · Support · Contact · Advertising · OpenLicense · About · Sitemap · Comments · Log in