- This topic has 2 replies, 3 voices, and was last updated 12 years ago by
.
- Posts
When doing question 1 with scenario we can see the pattern of providing audit procedures etc.
When I answer thsi question 1 myself I can see that sometimes I stick perfectly to the answer provided by examiner, but sometimes I have different ideas which seem also ok but they are lets say not on the answer sheet.
I was wondering how these kind of answers are treated by examiners, do they count only those which perfectly match to the answer model provided by examiner?
If so it’s unfair as this is scenario question and the ideas can be more than examiner’s figured out, of course I mean the answers which are in scope of the audit procedures (test of control or substantive procedures).
What do you think guys, what are yourt findings in this area?The examiner stated that its ok if you have any valid point different from her prescribed answer….it’s a discursive paper so students can come up with equally valid points….as far as i remember she said…this can also be validated if you look for marking schemes provided with each session’s answer sheet. But remember only valid points….
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.