- This topic has 3 replies, 2 voices, and was last updated 6 years ago by
.
-
Posts
-
My doubt is when fill owned 28% of the mine and approval for decisions only required 72% the how did fill have joint control?
fill unanimous consent is not required as he only owns 28% .
Marking scheme says:
Prior to the purchase of the additional investment, the approval of decisions required agreement by 72% of the participating
interests. A joint control situation existed between the entities.How was there a joint control situation?
Interesting
Those parties that have joint control (right of veto) would see this as a joint operation
Examiner doesn’t really reach any conclusion
I think he’s just looking for definitions of control and joint control
If I think of anything else I’ll post it later
Remember that SBR will sometimes ask about things where there is no right / wrong answer – if you’ve put the definitions down – you pass
- The topic ‘qs fill dec 2018 3c’ is closed to new replies.