Forums › Ask ACCA Tutor Forums › Ask the Tutor ACCA AFM Exams › Q MMC June 11
- This topic has 3 replies, 2 voices, and was last updated 9 years ago by John Moffat.
- AuthorPosts
- November 29, 2015 at 12:55 pm #286125
Hi John
I am looking at the MMC question June 11 on BSOP
In the solution the value of the option to delay is 9.53m
What does this value mean in words ?
And is it in any way related to the original NPV figure of negative 2.98m
The original NPV takes into account 2 years of investing 7m (14m in total) – although this is not reflected in the BSOP calc so I am struggling to relate them
Hope my question makes sense
November 29, 2015 at 2:24 pm #286138If the option did not exist the the NPV would be – 2.98M and we would not go ahead with the project. I think you are happy with that.
However, the cash flows during the sales period are uncertain. So they might be lower than estimated (in which case we would be pleased not to have gone ahead), but they could be higher than expected (in which case the project may well have been worthwhile).
Again, without the option, if we did do the project we would be committed to spend the extra 35M in two years time whether or not the returns were going to be higher or lower than currently estimated.What the option does is allow us in 2 years time to either invest the extra 35M (and then get the returns which might be a lot higher), or simply stop after 2 years and not invest the extra (and not get the returns).
Therefore having that option is worth something to us – it still gives us the chance of continuing if the returns are likely to be a lot higher than we currently expect, but allows us to pull out if they are not higher.
The BS formula puts a value on this option, and it means that with the option, the project is worth more to us that it was before (i.e. the current NPV plus the value of the option).
The $7M’s are not relevant when calculating the value of the option because they would be invested anyway whether or not we exercised. The option is as to whether to invest the extra $35M or not.
I hope that helps 🙂
November 29, 2015 at 3:04 pm #286155That is totally clear now John
Thank youYou make things very easy to understand.
Thanks again for your timeAnne
November 29, 2015 at 4:40 pm #286170You are welcome, and thank you for your comments 🙂
- AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.