• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free Notes, Lectures, Tests and Forums for ACCA and CIMA exams

  • ACCA
  • CIMA
  • FIA
  • OBU
  • Books
  • Forums
  • Ask AI
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login
  • ACCA Forums
  • Ask ACCA Tutor
  • CIMA Forums
  • Ask CIMA Tutor
  • FIA
  • OBU
  • Buy/Sell Books
  • All Forums
  • Latest Topics

20% off ACCA & CIMA Books

OpenTuition recommends the new interactive BPP books for March and June 2025 exams.
Get your discount code >>

PURSUIT Co

Forums › Ask ACCA Tutor Forums › Ask the Tutor ACCA AFM Exams › PURSUIT Co

  • This topic has 6 replies, 2 voices, and was last updated 5 years ago by John Moffat.
Viewing 7 posts - 1 through 7 (of 7 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • November 19, 2019 at 8:11 am #553053
    souz
    Member
    • Topics: 5
    • Replies: 16
    • ☆

    Hi john,
    I have a general doubt, if the question says asset beta of combined company is the weighted average of individual companies asset bets weighted in proportion of company market value. Here in this question they use the weighted proportion of total market value of the company ie using 140 m and 40m. If we use the equity value of of the companies will I get mark?

    Thanks in advance

    November 19, 2019 at 9:20 am #553056
    souz
    Member
    • Topics: 5
    • Replies: 16
    • ☆

    Sir,
    I need one more clarification for the same question. I have calculated as below:
    Total value of Fodder is 40089 hence MVE- 36080
    Total vale of Pursuit Equity is 70,000 (140*.50)
    Total value of combined company is 189,070 so the total equity value will be 94,535 (188070/2)
    So synergy calculation is = 94,535 -(70,000 + 36,080) = -11545

    Premium paid to fodder is 9020 so net benefit to pursuit is =20,565 (11545+9020)

    Can you please tell whether I can follow this method?
    Thanks

    November 19, 2019 at 10:20 am #553070
    John Moffat
    Keymaster
    • Topics: 57
    • Replies: 54659
    • ☆☆☆☆☆

    Although you would not lose all the marks, you would not get full marks. The question specifically says to weight by the market values of the companies and the market values of the companies are the equity plus the debt.

    No – the net benefit to Pursuit is not as you have typed. It is different from the examiners answer and the examiners answer is correct!!

    You need to look at the total market values (not just equity). Even if it had been valid, your final lines make no sense at all. You had a negative synergy benefit and any premium paid to fodder would make the benefit even more negative!!

    November 20, 2019 at 5:32 am #553118
    souz
    Member
    • Topics: 5
    • Replies: 16
    • ☆

    Hi John,
    Thanks for your reply.
    Sorry I got got to mention that in the last line it’s a negative synergy and by paying premium it’s negative 20565.
    For the same question BPP also have negative synergy.

    For my understanding when we find the synergy of combined company we remove the debt value rit? We need only the market value of equity because that only shows the real value of company because debt portion is amount owed to outsiders. I used to follow that method.is it correct or do we need to consider total market value sorry I am confused I was following this way long time please clarify me

    November 20, 2019 at 8:52 am #553134
    John Moffat
    Keymaster
    • Topics: 57
    • Replies: 54659
    • ☆☆☆☆☆

    I do not know what BPP have done because they do not have this question in the current edition of their Revision Kit.
    However I would assume that they have reprinted the examiners answer as usual, and there certainly is not negative synergy!!

    The synergy benefit is $9,074,000. Of this $9,022,000 is the premium required to acquire Fodder, which leaves a net benefit to Pursuit shareholders of $52,000.

    November 20, 2019 at 4:49 pm #553215
    souz
    Member
    • Topics: 5
    • Replies: 16
    • ☆

    Thanks for your time , I understood it now.

    November 21, 2019 at 12:43 pm #553279
    John Moffat
    Keymaster
    • Topics: 57
    • Replies: 54659
    • ☆☆☆☆☆

    You are welcome 🙂

  • Author
    Posts
Viewing 7 posts - 1 through 7 (of 7 total)
  • The topic ‘PURSUIT Co’ is closed to new replies.

Primary Sidebar

Donate
If you have benefited from our materials, please donate

ACCA News:

ACCA My Exam Performance for non-variant

Applied Skills exams is available NOW

ACCA Options:  “Read the Mind of the Marker” articles

Subscribe to ACCA’s Student Accountant Direct

ACCA CBE 2025 Exams

How was your exam, and what was the exam result?

BT CBE exam was.. | MA CBE exam was..
FA CBE exam was.. | LW CBE exam was..

Donate

If you have benefited from OpenTuition please donate.

PQ Magazine

Latest Comments

  • Venoth on Time Series Analysis – ACCA Management Accounting (MA)
  • mrjonbain on Professionalism, ethical codes and the public interest – ACCA Strategic Business Leader (SBL)
  • mrjonbain on Professionalism, ethical codes and the public interest – ACCA Strategic Business Leader (SBL)
  • kemo1000 on Financial instruments – convertible debentures – ACCA Financial Reporting (FR)
  • barbjohn on Equity Law, Ratio Decidendi – ACCA LW Global

Copyright © 2025 · Support · Contact · Advertising · OpenLicense · About · Sitemap · Comments · Log in