• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free Notes, Lectures, Tests and Forums for ACCA and CIMA exams

  • ACCA
  • CIMA
  • FIA
  • OBU
  • Books
  • Forums
  • Ask AI
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login
  • ACCA Forums
  • Ask ACCA Tutor
  • CIMA Forums
  • Ask CIMA Tutor
  • FIA
  • OBU
  • Buy/Sell Books
  • All Forums
  • Latest Topics

20% off ACCA & CIMA Books

OpenTuition recommends the new interactive BPP books for September 2025 exams.
Get your discount code >>

Pups calculation and treatment in the income statement

Forums › Ask ACCA Tutor Forums › Ask the Tutor ACCA FR Exams › Pups calculation and treatment in the income statement

  • This topic has 3 replies, 2 voices, and was last updated 8 years ago by MikeLittle.
Viewing 4 posts - 1 through 4 (of 4 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • July 22, 2016 at 4:36 pm #328387
    aamir2111
    Participant
    • Topics: 123
    • Replies: 85
    • ☆☆☆

    Dear Mike,

    If P sold goods worth 40,000 at markup of 20% to S => profit of inter entity trade = 40000 X 20% = 8000.
    Therefore in Cons. Income statement, Revenue & cost of sales will be reduced by $40,000 and we will add profit of $8000 to cost of sales. isn’t it?

    July 22, 2016 at 6:53 pm #328423
    MikeLittle
    Keymaster
    • Topics: 27
    • Replies: 23321
    • ☆☆☆☆☆

    No! In your example we have some inconsistencies

    1) When P sells goods to S worth $40,000 that suggests that the sale price is $40,000. For $40,000 to be interpreted as the cost, the question would read “P sold goods to S that had cost P $40,000 …… ”

    2) If the sales price of these goods is $40,000 and that figure includes a mark-up of 20%, then the cost price to P of those goods must have been 100/120 x $40,000 = $33,333

    3) The cancellation of the sale (whether it was a sale for $40,000 or for $48,000) is correct – reduce revenue by the sale price ($40,000 or $48,000 whichever one is the correct sale price) and reduce also cost of sales by that same amount

    4) Then add to cost of sales the $8,000 (if the total sale price was $48,000) or by $6,667 – where the total sale price was $40,000

    Is that ok?

    July 23, 2016 at 5:20 pm #328533
    aamir2111
    Participant
    • Topics: 123
    • Replies: 85
    • ☆☆☆

    Thanks Mike. It certainly helped me understand the concept well 🙂

    July 23, 2016 at 8:58 pm #328554
    MikeLittle
    Keymaster
    • Topics: 27
    • Replies: 23321
    • ☆☆☆☆☆

    You’re welcome

  • Author
    Posts
Viewing 4 posts - 1 through 4 (of 4 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
Log In

Primary Sidebar

Donate
If you have benefited from our materials, please donate

ACCA News:

ACCA My Exam Performance for non-variant

Applied Skills exams is available NOW

ACCA Options:  “Read the Mind of the Marker” articles

Subscribe to ACCA’s Student Accountant Direct

ACCA CBE 2025 Exams

How was your exam, and what was the exam result?

BT CBE exam was.. | MA CBE exam was..
FA CBE exam was.. | LW CBE exam was..

Donate

If you have benefited from OpenTuition please donate.

PQ Magazine

Latest Comments

  • julio99 on Impairments – Impairment (CGU) – ACCA Financial Reporting (FR)
  • effy.sithole@gmail.com on EPS – diluted EPS Example – ACCA Financial Reporting (FR)
  • Ken Garrett on The Finance Function in the Digital Age – CIMA E1
  • DeborahProspect on ACCA SBR Specimen Exam 2 Question 1
  • darshan.69 on Chapter 9 Pension Schemes TX-UK FA2023

Copyright © 2025 · Support · Contact · Advertising · OpenLicense · About · Sitemap · Comments · Log in