• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free Notes, Lectures, Tests and Forums for ACCA and CIMA exams

  • ACCA
  • CIMA
  • FIA
  • OBU
  • Books
  • Forums
  • Ask AI
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login
  • ACCA Forums
  • Ask ACCA Tutor
  • FIA Forums
  • CIMA Forums
  • OBU Forums
  • Qualified Members forum
  • Buy/Sell Books
  • All Forums
  • Latest Topics

March 2026 ACCA Exams

Comments & Instant poll

20% off ACCA & CIMA Books

OpenTuition recommends the new interactive BPP books for June 2026 exams.
Get your discount code >>

Pups calculation and treatment in the income statement

Forums › Ask ACCA Tutor Forums › Ask the Tutor ACCA FR Exams › Pups calculation and treatment in the income statement

  • This topic has 3 replies, 2 voices, and was last updated 9 years ago by MikeLittle.
Viewing 4 posts - 1 through 4 (of 4 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • July 22, 2016 at 4:36 pm #328387
    aamir2111
    Participant
    • Topics: 123
    • Replies: 85
    • ☆☆☆

    Dear Mike,

    If P sold goods worth 40,000 at markup of 20% to S => profit of inter entity trade = 40000 X 20% = 8000.
    Therefore in Cons. Income statement, Revenue & cost of sales will be reduced by $40,000 and we will add profit of $8000 to cost of sales. isn’t it?

    July 22, 2016 at 6:53 pm #328423
    MikeLittle
    Keymaster
    • Topics: 27
    • Replies: 23365
    • ☆☆☆☆☆

    No! In your example we have some inconsistencies

    1) When P sells goods to S worth $40,000 that suggests that the sale price is $40,000. For $40,000 to be interpreted as the cost, the question would read “P sold goods to S that had cost P $40,000 …… ”

    2) If the sales price of these goods is $40,000 and that figure includes a mark-up of 20%, then the cost price to P of those goods must have been 100/120 x $40,000 = $33,333

    3) The cancellation of the sale (whether it was a sale for $40,000 or for $48,000) is correct – reduce revenue by the sale price ($40,000 or $48,000 whichever one is the correct sale price) and reduce also cost of sales by that same amount

    4) Then add to cost of sales the $8,000 (if the total sale price was $48,000) or by $6,667 – where the total sale price was $40,000

    Is that ok?

    July 23, 2016 at 5:20 pm #328533
    aamir2111
    Participant
    • Topics: 123
    • Replies: 85
    • ☆☆☆

    Thanks Mike. It certainly helped me understand the concept well 🙂

    July 23, 2016 at 8:58 pm #328554
    MikeLittle
    Keymaster
    • Topics: 27
    • Replies: 23365
    • ☆☆☆☆☆

    You’re welcome

  • Author
    Posts
Viewing 4 posts - 1 through 4 (of 4 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
Log In

Primary Sidebar

Kaplan ACCA Free Trial

Donate
If you have benefited from our materials, please donate

ACCA News:

ACCA My Exam Performance for non-variant

Applied Skills exams is available NOW

ACCA Options:  “Read the Mind of the Marker” articles

Subscribe to ACCA’s Student Accountant Direct

ACCA CBE Exams – Instant Poll

How was your exam, and what was the exam result?

BT CBE exam was.. | MA CBE exam was..
FA CBE exam was.. | LW CBE exam was..

Donate

If you have benefited from OpenTuition please donate.

PQ Magazine

Latest Comments

  • Breadtoast67 on Strategy formulation (Part 2) – ACCA (AFM) lectures
  • adatya on Auditors’ Rights, Appointment, Removal, Resignation and Regulation – ACCA Audit and Assurance (AA)
  • John Moffat on Inventory Control (part 1) The EOQ Formula – ACCA Management Accounting (MA)
  • RuthlynE on FM Chapter 11 Questions – Sources of finance – equity
  • AllisonHoang on Inventory Control (part 1) The EOQ Formula – ACCA Management Accounting (MA)

Copyright © 2026 · Support · Contact · Advertising · OpenLicense · About · Sitemap · Comments · Log in