Forums › Ask ACCA Tutor Forums › Ask the Tutor ACCA FR Exams › Provision and contingent liabilities
- This topic has 3 replies, 2 voices, and was last updated 9 years ago by
MikeLittle.
- AuthorPosts
- February 29, 2016 at 3:51 am #302517
Hi Sir, I have question here. This question is from ACCA Dec 2011 Q4,
https://oi65.tinypic.com/24lr288.jpg
I do not understand why the $20m is included in non current assets. Can you explain? Thank you in advance.
February 29, 2016 at 9:42 am #302578Because this is the treatment where there is an obligation (legal or constructive) as in this case with the environmental damage restoration costs.
In the course notes you’ll find a rhetorical question “Where’s the debit” towards the end of the chapter on provisions and contingencies.
The obligation is (obviously) recorded as a liability, but where’s the debit? It’s included as an additional element of the cost of the asset – in this case, a licence
Check the course notes and then come back to me if you’re still not convinced
February 29, 2016 at 12:31 pm #302615Hi Sir, Thanks for the reply. Then I wonder why the variable elements is not charged to cost of asset? only in liability?
February 29, 2016 at 9:10 pm #302684Because the variable asset is a period cost and is not an obligation to be settled some years into the future
- AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.