- This topic has 1 reply, 2 voices, and was last updated 6 years ago by
.
Viewing 2 posts - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)
- Posts
Hi sir,
for a question having 6 marks, asking to explain proffessional scepticism and proffessional judgement; what all points have to be included?
I can’t image such a question asking for two terms to be explained for 6 marks – if you have such a question, presumably you also have an answer.
If the question was to explain the need for the exercise of professional scepticism and professional judgement – that would most likely be 1 mark each for stating what each term means – and 4 marks for explaining the need. For example, to recognise circumstances that may exist to cause the financial statements to be misstated or audit evidence that contradicts other audit evidence obtained.
Viewing 2 posts - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.