• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free Notes, Lectures, Tests and Forums for ACCA and CIMA exams

  • ACCA
  • CIMA
  • FIA
  • OBU
  • Books
  • Forums
  • Ask AI
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login
  • ACCA Forums
  • Ask ACCA Tutor
  • CIMA Forums
  • Ask CIMA Tutor
  • FIA
  • OBU
  • Buy/Sell Books
  • All Forums
  • Latest Topics

20% off ACCA & CIMA Books

OpenTuition recommends the new interactive BPP books for March and June 2025 exams.
Get your discount code >>

Professional clearance

Forums › Ask ACCA Tutor Forums › Ask the Tutor ACCA AAA Exams › Professional clearance

  • This topic has 5 replies, 2 voices, and was last updated 5 years ago by Kim Smith.
Viewing 6 posts - 1 through 6 (of 6 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • February 25, 2020 at 5:51 pm #563128
    akm9825
    Participant
    • Topics: 21
    • Replies: 35
    • ☆☆

    Section 13 of ISA 300 Additional considerations in initial audit engagements, states that the auditor shall…(b) communicate with the predecessor auditor…prior to starting an initial audit.
    My question is: Should we not seek professional clearance after we have been awarded an audit, which is after the tendering process and prior to final acceptance of the engagement?
    With reference to Ted Co (6/15), the BPP exam kit mentions that since the audit has been accepted, matters related to professional clearance were not relevant. However, the question only states that following the tendering process, the audit has been awarded to the firm. I’m a bit confused here. Kindly advise.
    Thanks

    February 26, 2020 at 7:56 am #563175
    Kim Smith
    Keymaster
    • Topics: 133
    • Replies: 8295
    • ☆☆☆☆☆

    Yes – this is what it sales in the Code about changes in a professional appointment:
    “A professional accountant in public practice who is asked to replace another
    professional accountant in public practice, or who is considering tendering for an
    engagement currently held by another professional accountant in public practice, shall
    determine whether there are any reasons, professional or otherwise, for not accepting
    the engagement, …”
    So communication must be BEFORE acceptance (and withholding of permission to communicate would be grounds for not accepting).
    In para 13 ISA 300 is simply saying that before an initial audit you have to have complied with ethical requirements – which, according to the code, should be before acceptance.

    I concur, if an engagement has been accepted you shouldn’t waste time on pre-acceptance considerations (which would include professional “clearance”).

    February 27, 2020 at 2:35 am #563258
    akm9825
    Participant
    • Topics: 21
    • Replies: 35
    • ☆☆

    Thank you for the clarifications.
    So, at this stage in the audit process, and wrt professional clearance, I should rather suggest any matter which may have been flagged by the predecessor auditor in the PF letter (or from a review of his/her audit file, if available) that may indicate a possible audit risk. Will that be correct as a general risk issue, in case I’m short of any other specific risk.

    February 27, 2020 at 8:09 am #563279
    Kim Smith
    Keymaster
    • Topics: 133
    • Replies: 8295
    • ☆☆☆☆☆

    You shouldn’t be short of specific risks in the real exam – if you look at marking schemes for “evaluation” you should be writing a short para up to 3 sentences (for max 3 marks) – so for 20 mark requirement you only need identify 7 “good” risks for 100% of the marks available.

    You should avoid pure invention/speculation as that just leads to digression and takes your mind away from visualising the specific scenario at hand.

    February 27, 2020 at 8:54 am #563286
    akm9825
    Participant
    • Topics: 21
    • Replies: 35
    • ☆☆

    Thank you for above clarifications.

    I saw a post on Materiality – Matter vs misstatement and was thinking about the marking scheme.
    Suppose that I wrongly calculated materiality (found something to be material when it is not), then wrongly states the proper accounting treatment, and then based on those conclusions, RIGHTLY concludes that because this particular matter is material to the FS, the auditor should modify his opinion by…with an ‘except for’ opinion and mention this in the Basis of opinion para…
    Will i still be awarded the marks for the conclusion on the opinion?

    February 27, 2020 at 9:26 am #563288
    Kim Smith
    Keymaster
    • Topics: 133
    • Replies: 8295
    • ☆☆☆☆☆

    If an “auditor’s report” question calls for discussion there may be scope for the marker to give credit (1 mark) for a conclusion which is consistent with the preceding discussion. However, I don’t think the scenario you suggest is likely – for something to merit discussion of implications for the auditor’s report it will most likely be material. A candidate should always “sanity check” a determination that something is immaterial if that leaves no more to said for the marks available.

  • Author
    Posts
Viewing 6 posts - 1 through 6 (of 6 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
Log In

Primary Sidebar

Donate
If you have benefited from our materials, please donate

ACCA News:

ACCA My Exam Performance for non-variant

Applied Skills exams is available NOW

ACCA Options:  “Read the Mind of the Marker” articles

Subscribe to ACCA’s Student Accountant Direct

ACCA CBE 2025 Exams

How was your exam, and what was the exam result?

BT CBE exam was.. | MA CBE exam was..
FA CBE exam was.. | LW CBE exam was..

Donate

If you have benefited from OpenTuition please donate.

PQ Magazine

Latest Comments

  • mohammedayan31 on Presentation of financial statements – Example 1 (revision) – ACCA Financial Reporting (FR)
  • John Moffat on The capital asset pricing model (part 2) – ACCA (AFM) lectures
  • John Moffat on Foreign exchange risk management (2) Part 1 – ACCA (AFM) lectures
  • zainab@24 on The capital asset pricing model (part 2) – ACCA (AFM) lectures
  • hana1992 on Foreign exchange risk management (2) Part 1 – ACCA (AFM) lectures

Copyright © 2025 · Support · Contact · Advertising · OpenLicense · About · Sitemap · Comments · Log in