• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free Notes, Lectures, Tests and Forums for ACCA and CIMA exams

  • ACCA
  • CIMA
  • FIA
  • OBU
  • Books
  • Forums
  • Ask AI
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login
  • ACCA Forums
  • Ask ACCA Tutor
  • FIA Forums
  • CIMA Forums
  • OBU Forums
  • Qualified Members forum
  • Buy/Sell Books
  • All Forums
  • Latest Topics

March 2026 ACCA Exams

Comments & Instant poll

20% off ACCA & CIMA Books

OpenTuition recommends the new interactive BPP books for June 2026 exams.
Get your discount code >>

process costing

Forums › FIA Forums › process costing

  • This topic has 1 reply, 2 voices, and was last updated 7 years ago by Kim Smith.
Viewing 2 posts - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • April 26, 2018 at 4:42 pm #448983
    amirrhamza786
    Member
    • Topics: 9
    • Replies: 0
    • ☆

    the following information relates to a company polishing process for the previous period
    output to finished goods 5408 units valued at $29744
    normal loss 276 units
    actual loss 112 units

    all losses have a scrap value of $2.50 per unit and there was no opening or closing work in progress

    the value of the input during the period was?

    April 27, 2018 at 7:55 am #449047
    Kim Smith
    Keymaster
    • Topics: 138
    • Replies: 8443
    • ☆☆☆☆☆

    The polishing cost of a unit of output is $29,744/5,408 = $5.50
    This is also the cost per unit of any abnormal loss (because it was supposed to be good output) and abnormal gain. The abnormal gain is 164 units (276 – 112)
    Input (units) = Actual output + Actual loss = 5,408 + 112 = 5,520
    Input = Actual output + Normal loss – Abnormal gain = 5,408 + 276 – 164
    Putting values to these, input = 29,744 + (276 x 2.50) – (164 x 5.50) = 29,532
    Another way of looking at is considering:
    Cost per unit ($5.50) = [Total cost incurred (x) – expected scrap (276 x $2.50)]/Expected good output
    Expected good output was only 5244 (i.e. 5408 – 164 )
    Rearranging, x = (5,244 x 5.5) + (276 x 2.5) = 28,842 + 690 = 29,532

  • Author
    Posts
Viewing 2 posts - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
Log In

Primary Sidebar

Kaplan ACCA Free Trial

Donate
If you have benefited from our materials, please donate

ACCA News:

ACCA My Exam Performance for non-variant

Applied Skills exams is available NOW

ACCA Options:  “Read the Mind of the Marker” articles

Subscribe to ACCA’s Student Accountant Direct

ACCA CBE Exams – Instant Poll

How was your exam, and what was the exam result?

BT CBE exam was.. | MA CBE exam was..
FA CBE exam was.. | LW CBE exam was..

Donate

If you have benefited from OpenTuition please donate.

PQ Magazine

Latest Comments

  • deepikasingh on ACCA BT Chapter 14 – How people learn – Questions
  • zurapirveli@gmail.com on Equity settled share based payments – goods – ACCA (SBR) lectures
  • Sid24012003 on Intangibles – Example 2 – ACCA Financial Reporting (FR)
  • Ken Garrett on CIMA BA1 Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient
  • Ana1674 on CIMA BA1 Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient

Copyright © 2026 · Support · Contact · Advertising · OpenLicense · About · Sitemap · Comments · Log in